Connect with us

Breaking News

Christie’s Bridgegate Baggage Is Back — And David Wildstein Should Be Question #1

Published

on

Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie is once again in the blast zone of Bridgegate. After Christie criticized Donald Trump on ABC this weekend, Trump fired back by threatening to push for a fresh look at the 2013 Fort Lee lane-closure scandal — the same episode that kneecapped Christie’s national ambitions and still shadows his claims of judgment and leadership. Independent reporting confirms Trump’s threat and the renewed political fight. 

Bridgegate is not ancient history. It’s a test of basic ethics in government: whether public power was abused to punish a local mayor and whether those at the top fostered — or tolerated — a political culture where that could happen. The core facts are not in dispute: lanes to the George Washington Bridge were closed in September 2013, causing massive gridlock in Fort Lee. Emails from Christie’s deputy chief of staff read, infamously, “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.” 

Two senior Christie allies — Bridget Anne Kelly and Bill Baroni — were convicted by a jury, only to have those convictions unanimously overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020 on narrow legal grounds: the scheme, as charged, did not aim to obtain money or property, which the federal fraud statutes require. That decision did not vindicate the conduct; it held the charged federal crimes didn’t fit the facts. Read it yourself: Justice Kagan’s opinion is concise and clear. 

And then there is David Wildstein.

Wildstein, a Christie appointee to the Port Authority, admitted he ordered the closures. He pleaded guilty in 2015, cooperated with prosecutors, and in 2017 received three years’ probation, 500 hours of community service, and financial penalties. That is the legal record. Wildstein now runs The New Jersey Globe as editor-in-chief — a position that gives him outsized influence over how Jersey politics are framed. These two facts together should make every reader — and every newsroom — sit up straight. 

Why Christie still hasn’t answered the fundamental question

Christie was never charged. But multiple proceedings and trial testimony placed his inner circle at the center of a punitive misuse of government power — under his watch, during his reelection. Whether he “knew then” has been contested in courtrooms and committee rooms, and Christie has repeatedly denied prior knowledge. None of that erases the leadership failure: a political operation close enough to him felt comfortable weaponizing a bridge. That’s not exoneration — that’s a management indictment. 

The media accountability gap around Wildstein

Wildstein isn’t just a historical figure in the case; he is a present-day gatekeeper in New Jersey political media. Given his admitted role and plea, his coverage and commentary on Christie, Bridgegate, and related players deserve rigorous scrutiny and transparent disclosure, every single time. When Bridgegate re-enters the conversation — as it did this week — Wildstein should be the first person aggressively questioned on-the-record about:

what he did, what others around Christie knew in real time, and how his outlet navigates conflicts when reporting on the scandal’s protagonists. That’s Journalism 101. (His current role at the New Jersey Globe is publicly stated by the outlet itself.) 

The Supreme Court ruling isn’t a moral clean bill of health

Some will wave the 2020 Supreme Court reversal as a political shield for Christie. Read the decision: the Court threw out the convictions because the federal fraud theory didn’t fit — not because the behavior was fine. Using public resources to choke a town for political payback is an abuse of power, even if it doesn’t satisfy a specific federal statute’s “money or property” element. That is precisely what the Court explained. 

What New Jersey should demand now

From Christie: clear answers about his office’s culture in 2013 and what, if anything, he did to hold wrongdoers accountable beyond public distancing. Voters deserve an account of leadership, not lawyered denials. (Background on the scandal’s documented facts is well established.)  From David Wildstein: on-the-record interviews about his admitted conduct and any contemporaneous communications with senior Christie aides; explicit conflict-of-interest practices at the Globe when covering Christie, Bridgegate, and Port Authority politics; and publication of a standing disclosure on Bridgegate pieces. (Wildstein’s plea and sentence are documented by DOJ.)  From the press: stop treating Bridgegate as old news when its principal actors still shape coverage and political narratives today. Re-read the legal record and ask sharper questions. (Recent reporting confirms the political fight has brought Bridgegate back to center stage.) 

Bottom line

Trump’s threat to resurrect Bridgegate as a political cudgel tells us less about Trump than it does about Christie’s unresolved problem: the scandal is a leadership stain that a Supreme Court opinion cannot bleach. And as long as David Wildstein — the man who admitted to ordering the closures — is editing a major New Jersey political outlet, the first accountability interview on any Bridgegate redux should start with him. That’s not personal. It’s responsible journalism grounded in the public record. 


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Fatal Fire in Union City Under Investigation by Authorities

Published

on

A fatal fire in Union City is currently under investigation by multiple agencies, according to an official statement released by the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office.

Hudson County Prosecutor Wayne Mello confirmed that the incident occurred on Saturday, April 18, 2026. The investigation is being conducted jointly by the Hudson County Regional Arson Task Force, North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue, and the Union City Police Department.

Authorities reported that at approximately 3:45 p.m., Union City police were notified of a fire near Bergen Turnpike and 38th Street. Upon arrival, first responders found an active fire affecting multiple structures, specifically 3808 through 3812 Bergen Turnpike.

During firefighting operations, responders discovered a deceased individual inside a residence at 3808 Bergen Turnpike. The victim has been tentatively identified as a 74-year-old woman. Officials have not yet released her identity pending further confirmation.

The fire also displaced a total of 22 residents, highlighting the broader impact of the incident on the surrounding community.

Union City EMS and North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue were the first units to arrive on scene following the initial working fire notification.

The cause of the fire remains under investigation, and authorities have not yet determined whether the incident was accidental or intentional. Officials stated that the investigation is ongoing and that additional information will be released as it becomes available.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations