Connect with us

Breaking News

Breaking: Charges Against Investigative Journalist Leroy Truth Fully Dismissed in Trenton Municipal Court — Another Major First Amendment Win

Published

on

Trenton, N.J. — October 14, 2025 — In a dramatic courtroom turn today, the State’s prosecutor in Trenton Municipal Court formally admitted — on the record, not just in filings — that investigative journalist Leroy Truth holds constitutionally protected rights under the First Amendment for his speech and reporting.

Following that admission, the Trenton, New Jersey assistant prosecutor Cindy Liccardo moved to dismiss all charges previously brought against him by the New Jersey State Police.

The judge granted the motion, concluding that the State’s case could not survive the threshold protection afforded to press and speech activities.

This marks yet another legal vindication for Leroy Truth in his long-running and highly contentious confrontation with Union City Mayor and New Jersey State Senator Brian Stack, whose alleged use of state institutions to silence critics has drawn renewed scrutiny in light of today’s decision.

Background: The Senate Judiciary Hearing and Unlawful Arrest

A few months ago, the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee, Chaired by Senator Brian P. Stack, convened a hearing on a controversial bill approved by Senators Stack and Sarlo. Leroy Truth attended to deliver his public critique, calling both the Bill that was proposed as well as New Jersey state senator, head of the New Jersey state judiciary committee and Union City, New Jersey Mayor Brian Stack corrupt and warning that the bill would effectively shield corruption and political machines.

As he spoke, Truth accused Senator Stack of being corrupt and warned the legislation’s real aim was to immunize those in power.

According to multiple accounts, Senator Stack—outraged by the criticism—immediately directed state police to forcefully remove Leroy Truth from the hearing room. Numerous horses within the New Jersey state police alleged that senator in Mayor Brian Stack had already arranged New Jersey State police to forcefully remove Leroy Truth in the days proceed in the meeting in Stack’s latest desperate attempt to stop Leroy Truth from continuing to investigate and exposes over 5000 allegation corruption that Truth has received over last 22 months.

It’s also critically important to know that New Jersey Senator and Union City mayor Brian Stack has allegedly had Leroy Truth attacks for political violence over 45 times over the last 22 months in an attempt to get right through to stop investigating exposing alleged extreme corruption.

Stacks actions of course are unprecedented in US American history where no journalist has ever endured so many political violent attacks against him as he is exercising his first amendment rights as an independent investigative journalist reporting on his YouTube Channel and Facebook Page Leroy Truth Investigations.

In the ensuing confrontation, State Trooper Sergeant Christopher Anicito, as seen on video, shockingly AND illegally turned off Leroy Truth’s camera, interfering with his recording of the event and seizing control of the narrative. The forced removal and camera shutdown triggered a cascade of claims — including abuse of authority, excessive force, and blatant First Amendment violations.

Leroy Truth was injured by the New Jersey State police as they were violently removing him and immediately went to the emergency room for medical treatment.

The removal and camera shutdown were captured on video and widely circulated, fueling public outrage and sparking lawsuits. Truth has long maintained Stack weaponized his political influence and law enforcement machinery to silence dissent. Truth was later charged by NJ State Trooper Sgt Christopher Anicito, for Disorderly Conduct/ Improper Behavior under 2C:33-2A(1).

Courtroom Today: Prosecutor Concedes First Amendment Protections

In today’s hearing, the prosecutor twice conceded that Truth’s speech and press activities were constitutionally protected, essentially stripping away the State’s justification for pursuing the charges. With no credible basis to proceed, the State voluntarily moved to dismiss all counts — a rare instance where the government itself abandons its own case in open court.

Observers say this is not just a personal victory for Truth, but a wider affirmation of press freedoms against politically motivated prosecutions. The dismissal underscores that even powerful public officials like Stack and Sarlo cannot use state police or municipal courts as blunt instruments to silence critics.

First Amendment Caselaw: Right to Record Officials and Government Accountability

Though the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet squarely recognized a universal “right to record” government officials in all settings, the trend in multiple federal appellate courts has been to treat filming or recording public officials performing their duties in public as a First Amendment–protected activity.

A widely cited example is Glik v. Cunniffe (655 F.3d 78, 1st Cir. 2011), in which the court held that a private citizen had the right to videotape public officials in public spaces. The Glik court observed that recording public officials is “an exercise of First Amendment liberties” and that the constitutional protection is not limited to professional journalists. 

Moreover, brief filed by the MFIA Clinic (Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic) refers to ongoing First Amendment litigation where Yale Law School’s clinic — which represents journalists, transparency advocates, and public-interest groups — has argued that turning off, deleting, or otherwise suppressing a person’s recording by a government actor (such as a police officer, state trooper, or public official) is itself a form of unconstitutional prior restraint and retaliation.

Turning off or confiscating a recording device is not “neutral conduct” — it’s content-based suppression.

This line of reasoning ties together multiple precedents:

Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Cir. 2011) — recording public officials is constitutionally protected.

Fields v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2017) — explicitly recognizes a citizen’s right to record police under the First Amendment.

Turner v. Driver (5th Cir. 2017) — extends the same protection, but notes officers may be immune if the right was not “clearly established” in their jurisdiction at the time.

Project Veritas Action Fund v. Rollins (1st Cir. 2020) — struck down a Massachusetts law prohibiting secret audio recording of public officials, reaffirming the strong protection of public recording activities.

Thus, the forced shutdown of Truth’s camera by Trooper Anicito arguably falls comfortably within the class of governmental action that courts have long guarded against.

Implications: Another Black Eye for Stack, But the Fight Continues

For Brian Stack and Senator Sarlo, today’s dismissal is more than a legal defeat — it is a public relations and constitutional rebuke. Stack’s alleged use of state police and prosecutorial machinery to retaliate against a journalist raises grave questions about the boundaries of political power and accountability in New Jersey.

Critics have long warned of the “weaponization of law-enforcement” — when officials under color of law use investigative or prosecutorial authority to target political opponents or critics. Today’s outcome bolsters the assertion that such tactics, if deployed, are vulnerable to judicial check.

That said, the fact that Truth had to litigate — repeatedly — to maintain his rights underscores an ongoing tension: accountability demands vigilance, resources, and legal fortitude. The victory today is significant, but it is not the final chapter.

In a comment Leroy Truth thanked his attorney Mario Blanch for helping get the charges dismissed as well as for asking the judge for the expedited expungement.

See the YouTube videos below for a recollection of the events that took place at the NJ State Senate Judiciary Committee.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations