Connect with us

Breaking News

Op-Ed: The Truth Behind Hudson County’s Political Machine Bill Spadea Didn’t Tell You

Published

on

When former Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Spadea published his recent column on Hudson County’s tangled web of politics, he pointed out some truths — but he also left out some of the most important truths.

We’ve covered Spadea before during the primary season, and while he was right to call attention to the Hudson County establishment, his latest piece barely scratches the surface. If we’re going to talk honestly about political power in Hudson County, we need to talk about State Senator and Union City Mayor Brian Stack — one of the most powerful and controversial figures in New Jersey politics.

The Side of Brian Stack You Won’t Read in Spadea’s Column

There’s no question that Brian Stack is a master of political organization. Even his critics admit that his get-out-the-vote (GOTV) operation is one of the most efficient in the state. But with that power has come a long history of controversy — and the record is well-documented.

Unconstitutional arrest of journalist Leroy Truth Investigations — In 2024, investigative journalist Leroy Truth was arrested by Union City police while filming and speaking at a city public commissioners meeting, raising serious First Amendment concerns. All charges were later dismissed, and civil rights advocates cited it as an example of official overreach. Workplace retaliation allegations — Multiple reports over the years have described a culture where city and Board of Education employees fear retaliation if they don’t show political loyalty. Accusations of pay-to-play within city agencies and the Board of Education — Local coverage has questioned whether promotions, assignments, and city contracts flow to those most active in Stack’s political network. Self-approved pay raises — Stack currently collects a combined income of roughly $180,000 from his dual roles as State Senator and part-time Mayor. His longtime partner, Mercedes Joaquin, is employed by the Union City Board of Education. Together, their combined public income approaches $400,000 annually — all taxpayer-funded.

For years, local media have also reported on FBI raids at Union City Hall and on recurring ethics concerns surrounding campaign fundraising, civic associations, and political employment. None of these realities appeared in Spadea’s column.

The Patronage Pipeline Few Acknowledge

Current Union City employees, report they have seen first-hand how political loyalty shapes the workforce. Many of the same people knocking on doors during election season — the ones often described as “volunteers” — are in fact city or Board of Education employees who know that participation is expected. Some of these same workers hold jobs at the Hudson County government level through Stack’s close alliance with County Executive Craig Guy.

A look at NJ ELEC filings shows patterns of campaign donations to Stack’s “Union City First” organization from individuals employed by the city, the police department, and the Board of Education. The higher the position or salary, the larger the contribution often seems to be. While campaign finance laws allow individual donations, the overlap between public employment and political fundraising raises fair questions about coercion and pay-to-play culture.

In short, the impressive-looking “army of volunteers” may not be the grassroots movement it appears to be — but rather a workforce politically captive to the same machine that controls their jobs.

The Kevin O’Toole Connection

Spadea mentioned former State Senator Kevin O’Toole, but missed another glaring issue.

O’Toole’s law firm, O’Toole Scrivo LLC, is currently contracted by Union City to handle employee and employer relations — a direct link between the city’s internal labor matters and state-level political figures. This relationship raises obvious questions about conflicts of interest, especially given that O’Toole himself has faced controversy in the past, including media reports about family disputes allegedly involving political influence.

When political allies hold the keys to both city employment and legal oversight, the lines between governance, loyalty, and personal power blur beyond recognition.

A Question for Jack Ciattarelli and Every Statewide Candidate

Even those who admire Stack’s political efficiency have to ask: At what cost?

Yes, Brian Stack can deliver votes. He may very well have helped former Governor Chris Christie in Hudson County, and any gubernatorial hopeful would be tempted to tap that kind of machine. But is it worth aligning with someone repeatedly accused of fostering patronage, protecting insiders, and blurring the boundary between public service and political loyalty?

Spadea’s article raised valid concerns about corruption — but it stopped short of exposing the full picture. To rebuild trust in government, we need more than just acknowledging the power of the machine; we need to confront how it operates, who it rewards, and who it punishes.

The Bottom Line

Hudson County’s political machinery runs deep. Brian Stack remains one of its most effective — and most controversial — operators. The real question isn’t whether his machine works. It’s whether New Jersey should continue to reward a system built on fear, favoritism, and self-preservation.

That’s the part of the story Bill Spadea didn’t tell — and it’s the part New Jersey voters deserve to know.

Bellow is a short list of reported controversies in Union City throughout the years:

– FBI raid of Union City City Hall / Community Development Agency (2012) — contemporaneous reporting of federal agents seizing files from City Hall.  .

– Contractors and CDA contract-rigging prosecutions tied to the CDA investigation (reporting and follow-ups). 

– Lawsuit alleging “pay-to-play” and micromanagement in Union City government (Observer coverage of a 2012 lawsuit by a former city attorney). 

-2014: “Union City pays $150,000 to settle former City official’s retaliation suit.” (Transparency NJ) – Former Planning Board attorney alleged Stack created a “pay‑to‑play” culture and retaliated when he complained.

-2013: “Ethics committee dismisses complaint against Stack.” (Observer) – A complaint concerning Stack’s dual roles and other alleged ethics violations was dismissed for lack of credible evidence.

– 2025: “Assembly Candidate Slams Union City Mayor for Urging Voters to Switch Parties.” (HudPost) – Stack mailed letters requesting voters switch parties temporarily to vote in another district’s primary, causing controversy.

– 2025: “A History Lesson of Corruption in Union City.” (Hudson County Truth) – Long-form piece compiling many allegations: patronage, use of state aid for machine politics, misuse of municipal vehicles, retaliation.

– 2017: “Union City confidentially paid out $100,000 to resolve ICE agent’s false arrest lawsuit.” (Transparency NJ) – ICE agent claimed he was wrongfully arrested and surveilled; city settled for $100,000.

– 2012: “Lawsuit against Stack alleges ‘pay‑to‑play’ system, heavy-handed micromanagement.” (Observer) – Lawsuit by former government attorney alleging Stack awarded city contracts based on political donations and operated a pay‑to‑play scheme.

-2007: “Vega accuses Stack of ‘abusing’ Union City employees.” (Observer / PoliticsNJ) – Allegations from current and former city employees that they were harassed/fired for refusing to support Stack’s campaign or purchase fundraiser tickets.

-2014‑2024: “Lawsuits: Cops have to donate to Brian P. Stack Civic Association to get promoted.” (Hudson County View) – Police officers alleged that to get promotions within the Union City Police Department they had to contribute to Stack’s Civic Association.

-2025: “Explosive Claims Reporting focused on school district staffing, salaries, patronage hires, and political loyalty within the Union City School District linked to Stack’s machine.

-2011: “In dismissing ethics complaint against Stack, committee wrestles with sorting out aide’s roles.” (Observer) – Complaint about Stack’s legislative aide doing municipal work while being paid as a legislative staffer; ethics committee dismissed it.

-2013: “Man charges N.J. mayor with choking him.” (UPI) – A man alleged Stack physically assaulted him (choking) at a holiday party; the case raised questions about abuse of office though outcome unclear.

And there’s so much more…


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Fatal Fire in Union City Under Investigation by Authorities

Published

on

A fatal fire in Union City is currently under investigation by multiple agencies, according to an official statement released by the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office.

Hudson County Prosecutor Wayne Mello confirmed that the incident occurred on Saturday, April 18, 2026. The investigation is being conducted jointly by the Hudson County Regional Arson Task Force, North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue, and the Union City Police Department.

Authorities reported that at approximately 3:45 p.m., Union City police were notified of a fire near Bergen Turnpike and 38th Street. Upon arrival, first responders found an active fire affecting multiple structures, specifically 3808 through 3812 Bergen Turnpike.

During firefighting operations, responders discovered a deceased individual inside a residence at 3808 Bergen Turnpike. The victim has been tentatively identified as a 74-year-old woman. Officials have not yet released her identity pending further confirmation.

The fire also displaced a total of 22 residents, highlighting the broader impact of the incident on the surrounding community.

Union City EMS and North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue were the first units to arrive on scene following the initial working fire notification.

The cause of the fire remains under investigation, and authorities have not yet determined whether the incident was accidental or intentional. Officials stated that the investigation is ongoing and that additional information will be released as it becomes available.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations