Breaking News
Union City’s Hires an Inspector General & The “Scandal-Free” Myth: The Record David Wildstein Didn’t Tell Readers
The New Jersey Globe article announcing Union City’s new inspector general reads less like a neutral news report and more like a piece of political advocacy. Rather than examining Union City’s long and well-documented history of federal scrutiny, litigation, and controversy, the article leans heavily into uncritical praise of Mayor Brian Stack, including the demonstrably inaccurate claim that he has governed a city “devoid of scandal” since 2000.
At the same time, editor David Wildstein recycles familiar talking points to discredit critics while omitting material context about past investigations, lawsuits, and settlements involving the city. The result is an article that downplays the public record, elevates political narrative over fact, and fails to provide readers with the balanced scrutiny expected of serious journalism.
Comical isn’t it?
Because Union City has not been “devoid of scandal.” It has been repeatedly touched by federal scrutiny, criminal cases tied to city operations, major litigation, and taxpayer-funded settlements — and Wildstein’s blanket “no scandal” line reads less like journalism and more like political PR.
The FBI raided Union City Hall—because of Union City
In November 2012, federal agents raided Union City Hall, with reporting tying the focus to the City’s Community Development Agency (CDA).
That fact alone makes “devoid of scandal” an indefensible absolute.
The CDA wasn’t just “talk.” DOJ announced prison time for CDA corruption.
The U.S. Department of Justice announced that a Union City Community Development Agency inspector was sentenced to 20 months in prison for conspiring with contractors to rig the contractor selection process.
Local reporting also described Union City reorganizing the CDA amid an FBI probe into an alleged contractor-selection scheme.
If Wildstein wants readers to believe Union City’s record is spotless, he should explain why federal prosecutors were putting people tied to a city agency on the record for corruption crimes.
Union City has paid out major settlements tied to allegations involving Stack and city power
A “scandal-free” city does not repeatedly cut checks to resolve lawsuits alleging misconduct.
Union City paid $100,000 to settle a lawsuit brought by a Homeland Security/ICE agent, with reporting describing allegations including abuse of power / illegal arrest claims. Union City paid $67,000 to settle a wrongful arrest lawsuit brought by a former Newark police officer, according to local reporting.
Settlements aren’t convictions — but they are not “nothing,” and they do not belong in a fairy tale about a government “devoid of scandal.”
The pay-to-play allegations Wildstein can’t erase: Union City police promotion lawsuits
If Wildstein truly believes Stack’s Union City is scandal-free, he should start by confronting the lawsuits filed by Union City police officers alleging a political patronage culture where career advancement depended on political loyalty and/or donations.
In 2015, Hudson County View reported that five Union City police officers sued Stack, alleging they had to contribute to the Brian P. Stack Civic Association to get promoted.
Those were not vague rumors — the underlying complaints were publicly posted and describe a claimed “pay-to-play” environment:
Michael Figueroa v. Brian Stack (complaint PDF) Mark Julve v. Brian Stack (complaint PDF) Jorge A. Porres v. Brian Stack (complaint PDF; includes “pay-to-play” framing) Joaquin Ruiz v. Brian Stack (complaint PDF)
These cases later reached the appellate level. A published New Jersey court opinion (unpublished) references the consolidated matters and includes discussion of retaliation allegations tied to political association; it specifically identifies Figueroa among the plaintiffs.
There was also litigation activity around donor information: reporting describes a motion seeking the civic association’s donor list, and a subsequent ruling requiring turnover of certain donor records.
Wildstein can praise “ethics” all day. But you cannot responsibly tell readers Union City is scandal-free while the record contains multiple police promotion lawsuits alleging pay-to-play dynamics, court proceedings, and litigation over donor documentation.
And there’s so much more!
And then there’s the messenger: David Wildstein’s credibility problem
Wildstein is not just a neutral editor offering a detached civic blessing. He is David Wildstein of Bridgegate — a central figure in one of New Jersey’s most notorious political scandals.
A DOJ release states Wildstein was sentenced to probation, 500 hours of community service, and ordered to pay restitution and a fine for his role in the scheme.
And major coverage has documented his role and admissions in the Bridgegate affair.
That history doesn’t automatically invalidate every sentence he writes today — but it does make it especially rich when he lectures the public about “integrity” while trying to launder a political machine town as “devoid of scandal.”
The false “harassment” narrative and Wildstein’s abandonment of basic journalism
David Wildstein repeats Mayor Brian Stack’s claim that investigative journalists, Leroy Truth, is “harassing” him, but that framing collapses under even minimal legal scrutiny. What Wildstein pointedly ignores — despite holding himself out as a journalist — is that Leroy’s conduct fits squarely within constitutionally protected investigative journalism and political speech under the First Amendment. Stack’s attempts to rebrand scrutiny as “harassment” or “cyberbullying” were tested in court and did not hold up; the charges were dismissed because public officials cannot criminalize criticism or investigation simply because it is aggressive, persistent, or uncomfortable.
By parroting Stack’s talking points while omitting the constitutional reality and court outcomes, Wildstein demonstrates either a willful disregard for the law governing press freedoms or a fundamental misunderstanding of journalism itself — both of which undermine his credibility when lecturing readers about ethics and integrity.
The recycled “paid agitator” smear — and the proof Wildstein never provides
David Wildstein continues to recycle the same tired narrative favored by Brian Stack: that Leroy Truth is a “paid agitator” secretly backed by North Bergen Mayor, Nick Sacco. But after years of repetition, Wildstein still offers no evidence—no documents, no records, no verified reporting—to support that claim. Publicly available sources reflect political back-and-forth and litigation, not proof of payment; even coverage cited elsewhere includes Sacco’s own denial (e.g., InsiderNJ). Attempts to point to prior, disclosed payments to Leroy during a primary campaign do not prove Sacco funding anything; they show standard, reported compensation for social-media advertising, as reflected in filings with the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission. Conflating lawful campaign advertising with a secret paymaster is not reporting—it’s insinuation. If Wildstein or Stack have proof of Sacco paying Leroy, they should publish it. If they don’t, they should stop repeating the smear and, as journalists are taught early, take a seat until the facts are there.
The hypocrisy is the story
Wildstein wants the audience to accept two ideas at once:
Union City under Stack is “devoid of scandal.” The city needs a powerful new inspector general to guarantee ethics and efficiency.
Those can’t both be true. If Union City were truly scandal-free, there would be no FBI raid headline, no DOJ prison sentence tied to a city agency, no trail of settlements, and no string of police officer lawsuits alleging a culture of political retaliation and donation-linked advancement.
Cybercrimes Unit Resources
David Malagold spent years in the Cybercrime Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Newark, and in a city where Mayor Brian Stack has already unsuccessfully tried to weaponize “harassment” and “cyberbullying” claims against Leroy Truth, the concern is obvious and legitimate. Stack has repeatedly shown an appetite for reframing protected investigative journalism as criminal conduct, and the last thing Union City needs is a former cybercrime prosecutor being pulled—directly or indirectly—into that political vendetta.
Let’s be clear: using the language, resources, or implied authority of cybercrime enforcement to intimidate, chill, or retaliate against a journalist for exposing alleged corruption would be a blatant abuse of power and a First Amendment outrage. Stack’s history earns him no presumption of good faith.
The inspector general should take notice now: any move that even smells like cyber-based retaliation will put his office squarely on the radar of civil-rights advocates, media watchdogs, and activists who are more than prepared to hold him accountable.
A direct message to Union City’s new Inspector General
Union City’s newly announced inspector general is a former federal prosecutor. The City and the public are both going to invoke “ethics” and “integrity” now — and that’s exactly why this moment matters.
We are giving the inspector general the benefit of the doubt. But benefit of the doubt is not a blank check. The documented history surrounding Union City — including federal scrutiny, corruption convictions tied to city operations, settlements, and police “pay-to-play” promotion litigation — demands oversight that is real, public, and fearless.
If this office becomes another layer of political insulation, people will notice. If the office confronts wrongdoing wherever it is found — without favor and without fear — residents will notice that too.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Fatal Fire in Union City Under Investigation by Authorities
A fatal fire in Union City is currently under investigation by multiple agencies, according to an official statement released by the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office.
Hudson County Prosecutor Wayne Mello confirmed that the incident occurred on Saturday, April 18, 2026. The investigation is being conducted jointly by the Hudson County Regional Arson Task Force, North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue, and the Union City Police Department.
Authorities reported that at approximately 3:45 p.m., Union City police were notified of a fire near Bergen Turnpike and 38th Street. Upon arrival, first responders found an active fire affecting multiple structures, specifically 3808 through 3812 Bergen Turnpike.
During firefighting operations, responders discovered a deceased individual inside a residence at 3808 Bergen Turnpike. The victim has been tentatively identified as a 74-year-old woman. Officials have not yet released her identity pending further confirmation.
The fire also displaced a total of 22 residents, highlighting the broader impact of the incident on the surrounding community.
Union City EMS and North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue were the first units to arrive on scene following the initial working fire notification.
The cause of the fire remains under investigation, and authorities have not yet determined whether the incident was accidental or intentional. Officials stated that the investigation is ongoing and that additional information will be released as it becomes available.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN
SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.
The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:
Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct
Every single charge is now gone.
⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart
This wasn’t just one case.
Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.
This isn’t random.
Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.
👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.
The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.
🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire
This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.
Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:
– Understanding basic constitutional rights
– Proper handling of public meetings
– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings
Let’s break it down simply:
– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.
– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism
– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections
Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.
👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:
Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?
Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.
⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence
Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:
– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.
– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .
– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.
These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.
And now, it’s happening again.
🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case
These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.
Yes, there are rules.
Yes, meetings need order.
But the law is clear:
👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.
That’s where the line is.
And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.
🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore
Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.
Some see him as a watchdog.
Others see him as disruptive.
But here’s what actually matters:
👉 The charges are not sticking.
And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.
📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police
No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.
When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:
– Wastes public resources
– Damages the department’s credibility
– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making
And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.
👉 It becomes a pattern.
🧠 Bottom Line
This case is over.
The charges are dismissed.
But the real issue remains:
👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?
Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.
Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.
What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges
Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.
The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.
Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed
According to the complaint records reviewed:
Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.



Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .


Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.


Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.



The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.
Allegations Regarding the Incident
According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.
It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.
Political Reaction and Public Criticism
The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.
Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.
None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.
Court Process Ahead
The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.
Presumption of Innocence
All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.
Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Breaking News7 months agoJimmy Davis Can’t Run From the Truth: The People Deserve to Know Who He Really Is
-
Breaking News12 months agoA Closer Look at Jamie Chebra: Former Jersey City EMS Leader’s Past and Present Under Scrutiny
-
Breaking News1 year agoUNION CITY POLICE OFFICER FERNANDO MURO IS FAMOUS!
-
Breaking News6 months agoBREAKING: Scandal Erupts Inside Hudson County Sheriff’s Office — Lt. Fedrow Found Guilty of Sexual Misconduct, County Officials Accused of Political Protection
-
Breaking News1 year agoA History Lesson of Corruption in Union City
-
Breaking News1 year ago🔥🚔 BREAKING: UNION CITY POLICE CHIEF ANTHONY FACCHINI IS A DISGRACE! OFFICERS WANT HIM GONE IMMEDIATELY! 🚔🔥
-
Breaking News1 year agoRepublican Assembly Candidate Condemns Brian Stack Letter, Calls for Term Limits
-
Breaking News11 months ago📰 BREAKING: Barbara Pinzon Ousted in Union City Teachers Union Shake-Up – Juana Dominguez and Daniel Prusko Elected in Historic Shift Towards Transparency and Reform
