Connect with us

Breaking News

Enough Is Enough: Parents Escalate Fight Against Union City’s Mayor Brian Stack in Explosive New Mailing

Published

on

Union City, New Jersey — February 2026

A second wave of public criticism has now emerged in Union City, as a newly circulated letter from a group identifying itself as the “Concerned Parents of Union City” directly responds to Mayor Brian Stack’s recent defense letter and sharply intensifies accusations against both City Hall and the Union City Board of Education.

The mailing, delivered to residents throughout the community in February, signals that the controversy surrounding school leadership and student safety is not fading — it is growing.

A Direct Rebuttal to the Mayor

The parents’ letter positions itself as a response to Mayor Stack’s public defense, accusing the administration of avoiding the central issue raised by families: child safety.

According to the letter, parents demanded the immediate suspension of Union City High School Assistant Principal Edwin Marinez pending an independent investigation into allegations described as involving sexual misconduct and abuse affecting students.

Rather than reassurance, the letter claims the mayor’s response focused on defending his administration and dismissing critics.

The authors argue that key actions were not taken, stating that leadership:

– did not suspend the educator pending review,

– did not directly deny or clarify the allegations, and

– did not provide assurances that students are protected.

The message from the parents is blunt: leadership addressed politics, not parental fears.

Expanding Criticism Beyond One Incident

The February mailing goes further than a single personnel dispute. It alleges what the authors describe as a broader pattern under the current administration — one in which complaints are minimized and critics face retaliation.

The letter references past controversies and claims that individuals accused of misconduct have previously been protected or reassigned rather than fully scrutinized. Whether residents agree or disagree, the political significance is clear: the controversy has evolved from an isolated allegation into a referendum on governance itself.

By framing the issue as systemic rather than individual, the parents’ message directly challenges the credibility of both the Union City Board of Education and City leadership.

The Role of the Board of Education

A central theme of the new letter is frustration with institutional silence.

The Union City Board of Education — entrusted with safeguarding students — is criticized for what the authors characterize as inaction and lack of transparency. The mailing argues that public confidence erodes when school officials fail to visibly demonstrate independence from political leadership.

For many residents, the question raised is no longer simply whether allegations exist, but whether oversight structures function independently enough to investigate them without political influence.

Public schools operate on trust. When parents believe that trust is compromised, the damage extends far beyond any single controversy.

Anonymity and Fear

The letter dedicates an entire section to explaining why its authors remain anonymous, claiming community members fear retaliation, job loss, or professional consequences for speaking publicly.

Regardless of political perspective, the existence of anonymous civic organizing reflects a deeper issue: a perception among some residents that open dissent carries risk.

In democratic communities, anonymity is often a symptom of distrust in institutions meant to protect free expression.

A Political Turning Point?

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the February letter is its tone. What begins as a demand for investigation evolves into a broader civic call to action.

The authors argue that prolonged political dominance has concentrated power too heavily and warn that unchecked authority leads to complacency and lack of accountability. Their message to residents is explicit: community change requires public participation.

The mailing closes with a call for residents to come forward, share experiences, and demand transparency — framing the moment as one that extends beyond education policy into the character of local government itself.

The Larger Message to the Public

Whether one agrees with the accusations or with Mayor Stack’s defense, the emergence of a second organized mailing demonstrates a growing divide between segments of the public and those in power.

Democracy at the local level depends not only on elections but on accountability between them. When parents believe their concerns are ignored, frustration turns into mobilization.

The controversy now confronting Union City is no longer just about a letter or a response. It has become a test of public trust — and a reminder that political authority ultimately derives from the people it serves.

For supporters of the administration, the letters may represent political attacks.

For critics, they represent whistle-blowing and civic courage.

But one reality is undeniable: a portion of the community is demanding answers, and the conversation is no longer confined to City Hall.

As the parents’ letter makes clear, the debate has entered a new phase — one defined by a growing call from residents to stand up, speak openly, and challenge what they view as the misuse of political power.

New whistleblowers coming forward

Following the circulation of the second letter, sources connected to the concerned parents say that several additional alleged victims have now come forward and have expressed willingness to speak publicly about their experiences.

According to those sources, the individuals plan to be interviewed this week by independent investigative journalist Leroy Truth alongside his colleague and friend David Snow of The Exposure Report on YouTube, where they are expected to discuss new allegations involving Union City Assistant Principal Edwin Maranez and share what they describe as deeply disturbing accounts.

Viewers are being advised to stay tuned as Leroy Truth prepares to release these interviews in the coming days as part of an ongoing investigative series.

A Spanish version of the letter is displayed in the back of the letter.

English
Spanish

Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations