Connect with us

Breaking News

Corruption Watchdog or Political Shield? OPIA Destroys Evidence as Hudson County’s Political Machine Expands Its Grip

Published

on

June 27, 2025

The very agency tasked with rooting out corruption in New Jersey has now been caught engaging in what appears to be a shocking act of self-protection and possible evidence tampering.

According to a bombshell report from the New Jersey Globe, the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA)—a division under the New Jersey Attorney General’s office—intentionally destroyed work-issued cell phones belonging to three of their own lead investigators in a major political corruption case. These phones contained key text messages that were never preserved, despite active discovery requests dating back as far as 2020.

Let that sink in: the watchdogs destroyed their own evidence.

🚨 OPIA’s Stunning Disregard for Justice

The corruption case in question involved former Assemblyman Jason O’Donnell, accused of accepting cash in a sting operation tied to pay-to-play politics in Bayonne. But now, thanks to the OPIA’s actions, the focus has shifted from the defendant to the prosecutors themselves.

In court filings, defense attorney Leo Hurley described the destruction of these phones as a direct threat to the constitutional rights of the accused. The wiped devices belonged to OPIA investigators Michael Fallon, Ho Chul Shin, and Brian Powers—key players in the sting operation whose communications could have held critical exculpatory or procedural information.

Adding to the embarrassment, a fourth phone remains missing entirely, its investigator reportedly on military leave.

How does this happen in an office supposedly dedicated to public integrity?

🔥 A Pattern of Incompetence, Corruption, and Political Cover-Ups

Let’s not pretend this is an isolated incident. The OPIA, since its creation, has been repeatedly accused of being more of a political weapon than a justice-seeking body. Critics across both political parties have raised serious concerns about the unit’s lack of accountability, its tendency to selectively prosecute, and now, its apparent willingness to destroy evidence when it suits them.

The New Jersey Attorney General’s office—headed by Matt Platkin—has yet to provide a credible explanation as to why these devices were wiped long after discovery obligations were established. Instead, the response from the state has been muted, bureaucratic, and frankly, insulting to the intelligence of the New Jersey public.

Where is the urgency? Where is the independent oversight? Why are the people who claim to be cleaning up corruption allowed to operate in the shadows without consequence?

🔗 The Corruption Network: Bayonne to the Sheriff’s Department

As this story unfolds, it coincides with another troubling development in Hudson County: Bayonne Mayor Jimmy Davis has just won the Democratic primary for Hudson County Sheriff, defeating five-term incumbent Frank Schillari.

Let’s be clear—Davis does not bring a reputation of reform. He brings a well-known track record of scandals and possible corruption. Given that the original pay-to-play corruption in Bayonne was exposed under his watch, it is not a stretch to assume that this same culture of backroom deals and political favoritism could now spread directly into the sheriff’s department once Davis is sworn in.

Even more concerning, Davis was heavily backed by none other than the already scandal-ridden Union City Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, a figure deeply entrenched in the Hudson County political machine.

This isn’t just about Bayonne anymore. The web of corruption appears to be tightening its grip on key law enforcement positions, potentially reaching deeper into Hudson County and the state government itself. The OPIA’s destruction of evidence in the O’Donnell case now seems less like a tragic error and more like business as usual in a county where the political machine’s influence is vast, unchecked, and dangerously interconnected.

⚖️ Systemic Breakdown

When law enforcement agencies destroy their own evidence, it doesn’t just undermine a single case—it undermines the entire justice system.

How many other investigations have been quietly compromised by OPIA’s incompetence or, worse, deliberate misconduct? How many political careers have been protected because of phones that suddenly went missing or files that mysteriously disappeared?

This is not about partisan politics—this is about the basic expectation that those who enforce the law must also follow it.

🚨 Immediate Federal Investigation Needed

The people of New Jersey deserve more than carefully worded press releases and half-hearted internal reviews. This situation demands an immediate, independent, federal investigation.

The destruction of evidence by the OPIA reeks of a cover-up and points to a systemic rot inside the very agency tasked with protecting the public trust. The Attorney General’s office should not be allowed to police itself—especially not now.

New Jersey has a long and painful history of corruption. With Jimmy Davis now set to control the Hudson County Sheriff’s Office, backed by political powerbrokers like Brian Stack, we may be witnessing a dangerous new chapter where the reach of the Hudson County political machine extends even further into law enforcement and state government.

The next court hearing in the O’Donnell case is scheduled for October 21, but New Jerseyans shouldn’t wait until then to demand answers.

We must ask:

Who watches the watchdogs? And who is protecting them?


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations