Breaking News
Brian Stack’s Using the Police to Go After Memes: Charges Dismissed

It seems Union City Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack has once again demonstrated his well-known intolerance for criticism — this time by filing cyber harassment charges against investigative journalist Leroy Filipowski, known to many as “Leroy Truth.” The so-called “offense”? Publicly calling Stack a corrupt politician, making memes, and posting satirical criticism online.
If this sounds absurd, that’s because it is. The narrative in the police report reads like political fan fiction — dripping with bias, packed with subjective conclusions, and signed off by none other than Lieutenant Glenn Gaston, “Mr. Brady List” himself, who is the last person on Earth who should be signing off on anything related to credibility or reputation.


The report’s author, Detective Valladares, goes so far as to describe the journalist’s allegations against Stack as “unsupported.” That is not only laughable, it’s an outright abuse of position. As a detective, Valladares is well beyond her legal authority — and her professional capabilities — to make a blanket declaration that allegations are unsupported when multiple journalists, activists, and critics have already produced documented evidence, court records, and first-hand accounts of Stack’s questionable conduct going back years.
Even more ridiculous is the fact that this report frames Leroy’s appearance at City Hall and other public venues as some sort of “harassment” — when in reality, these are public places where elected officials are required to face public scrutiny. The mere act of telling an elected official to resign, whether loudly or repeatedly, is political speech at the core of First Amendment protections. The fact that Union City law enforcement appears unable to distinguish between harassment and constitutionally protected public criticism should alarm every citizen. It also raises serious questions about just how low the educational and constitutional literacy requirements are for becoming a police officer in the state of NJ.
Stack and Valladares should be reminded of landmark case law that has long protected exactly this kind of speech:
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) — Established that public officials cannot recover damages for defamation unless they prove “actual malice,” a high standard meant to ensure robust debate on public issues.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988) — Held that parody and satire of public figures, even if offensive, are protected speech under the First Amendment.
Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949) — Affirmed that speech cannot be punished simply because it stirs anger or unrest; in fact, that is often its purpose in a free society.
Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011) — Upheld the right to engage in hurtful, outrageous, or controversial speech in public forums when addressing matters of public concern.
In other words, political satire, memes, and verbal criticism of elected officials — even aggressive or mocking criticism — are all constitutionally protected activities. The U.S. Supreme Court has been crystal clear for decades: public officials are bound to endure public criticism as part of their position. That includes when they are officiating weddings, conducting city business, or otherwise exercising their official authority.
Brian Stack’s reputation problems didn’t start with Leroy Truth showing up in Union City. Far from it. Stack has a long history of controversy, troubling incidents, and community criticism that have eroded public trust for decades. The idea that a few internet memes or YouTube videos are what’s “ruining” his reputation or “questioning Stack’s integrity” is beyond comical — it’s delusional. Stack has done more than enough damage to his own image without Leroy ever lifting a finger.
Even the supposed “harassment” described in the report amounts to public speech in public spaces — a cornerstone of American democracy. Showing up at city buildings, attending public meetings, and asking hard questions is called holding public officials accountable. That’s not harassment — it’s exactly what’s supposed to happen in a free society. The fact that Stack is running to the police to criminalize satire and criticism speaks volumes about his inability to tolerate dissent.
The cherry on top? The approving officer is Lieutenant Glenn Gaston, whose own name appears on the Brady List — a public record for officers with credibility issues. The irony here could power the city’s streetlights for a year. If there’s anyone in Union City government who should be the last to speak about “tarnished reputations,” it’s Gaston.
Let’s be crystal clear: the First Amendment protects exactly the type of speech Stack is trying to silence. Political satire, memes, and harsh public commentary are not crimes. If Brian Stack can’t handle being called corrupt or seeing his face in a meme, then maybe the problem isn’t the journalist — maybe it’s the man in the mirror.
Instead of using taxpayer-funded law enforcement resources to chase down critics, perhaps Mayor/Senator Stack should focus on addressing the very real issues that have been dragging his name through the mud for decades. Until then, these politically motivated police reports will stand as nothing more than monuments to thin skin and abuse of power.
And now, in a twist of poetic justice, as of today those very charges filed against Leroy Truth have been DISMISSED by the Newark Municipal Court — a fitting end to a case that never should have existed in the first place.






Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN
SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.
The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:
Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct
Every single charge is now gone.
⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart
This wasn’t just one case.
Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.
This isn’t random.
Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.
👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.
The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.
🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire
This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.
Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:
– Understanding basic constitutional rights
– Proper handling of public meetings
– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings
Let’s break it down simply:
– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.
– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism
– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections
Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.
👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:
Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?
Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.
⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence
Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:
– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.
– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .
– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.
These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.
And now, it’s happening again.
🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case
These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.
Yes, there are rules.
Yes, meetings need order.
But the law is clear:
👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.
That’s where the line is.
And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.
🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore
Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.
Some see him as a watchdog.
Others see him as disruptive.
But here’s what actually matters:
👉 The charges are not sticking.
And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.
📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police
No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.
When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:
– Wastes public resources
– Damages the department’s credibility
– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making
And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.
👉 It becomes a pattern.
🧠 Bottom Line
This case is over.
The charges are dismissed.
But the real issue remains:
👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?
Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.
Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.
What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges
Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.
The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.
Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed
According to the complaint records reviewed:
Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.



Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .


Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.


Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.



The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.
Allegations Regarding the Incident
According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.
It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.
Political Reaction and Public Criticism
The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.
Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.
None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.
Court Process Ahead
The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.
Presumption of Innocence
All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.
Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City
A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.
Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.
More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Breaking News6 months agoJimmy Davis Can’t Run From the Truth: The People Deserve to Know Who He Really Is
-
Breaking News12 months agoA Closer Look at Jamie Chebra: Former Jersey City EMS Leader’s Past and Present Under Scrutiny
-
Breaking News1 year agoUNION CITY POLICE OFFICER FERNANDO MURO IS FAMOUS!
-
Breaking News6 months agoBREAKING: Scandal Erupts Inside Hudson County Sheriff’s Office — Lt. Fedrow Found Guilty of Sexual Misconduct, County Officials Accused of Political Protection
-
Breaking News1 year agoA History Lesson of Corruption in Union City
-
Breaking News1 year ago🔥🚔 BREAKING: UNION CITY POLICE CHIEF ANTHONY FACCHINI IS A DISGRACE! OFFICERS WANT HIM GONE IMMEDIATELY! 🚔🔥
-
Breaking News1 year agoRepublican Assembly Candidate Condemns Brian Stack Letter, Calls for Term Limits
-
Breaking News1 year agoPBA No Confidence Vote for Union City Police Chief Anthony Facchini
