Breaking News
Escuelas de Union City en crisis: clientelismo sobre los alumnos
Union City, Nueva Jersey — El Distrito Escolar de Union City se encuentra al borde del colapso. A pesar de recibir cientos de millones de dólares en fondos estatales y federales cada año, el distrito ha despedido maestros, eliminado programas extracurriculares, suspendido el servicio de transporte escolar y recortado apoyos críticos como ABA y educación temprana. Familias y empleados están indignados: con tanto financiamiento, ¿cómo es posible que los estudiantes reciban menos?
La respuesta, señalan los críticos, está en la máquina política del alcalde y senador estatal Brian Stack. El alcalde, que ejerce una influencia desproporcionada sobre el distrito gracias a su poder de nombrar a la Junta de Educación, ha convertido las escuelas de Union City en un sistema de clientelismo político que prioriza empleos para sus aliados por encima de las aulas y los estudiantes.
Financiamiento millonario, servicios mínimos
Union City es uno de los distritos más financiados en todo Nueva Jersey:
En 2023–24, el distrito reportó casi 389 millones de dólares en ingresos operativos, de los cuales unos 242 millones provinieron del estado. Por cada estudiante, Union City recibe más del doble de ayuda que muchos distritos vecinos, incluidos Jersey City y North Bergen.
Sin embargo, pese a este dinero, el distrito ha reducido servicios esenciales. Los maestros pierden sus empleos, los programas extracurriculares desaparecen y los apoyos de educación especial se reducen al mínimo. Los padres se preguntan dónde está realmente ese dinero.
Excusas falsas frente a la realidad
Los funcionarios del distrito han intentado justificar estos recortes culpando a la pandemia de COVID-19, a la inflación e incluso a políticas federales. Pero estas explicaciones no resisten análisis.
Es cierto que a nivel nacional se ha impulsado la reducción del gasto desperdiciado. Pero precisamente de eso se trata: si Union City hubiera utilizado sus fondos de manera responsable, no existiría ninguna crisis. La única razón por la que el distrito “siente” el impacto de cualquier recorte es porque ha decidido gastar el dinero en mantener empleos políticos innecesarios, no en los estudiantes.
Como dijo un docente frustrado: “Si realmente invirtieran en los niños primero, no estaríamos en esta situación. Lo único que les preocupa es proteger su sistema de favores políticos.”
Una nueva escuela de $93,7 millones en medio de la escasez
Mientras faltan recursos en las aulas, Union City avanza con la construcción de la Academia Esther Salas, un nuevo colegio intermedio de seis pisos para 900 estudiantes, con un costo de 93,7 millones de dólares, programado para abrir en 2025.
Aunque los funcionarios presentan el proyecto como un símbolo de progreso, muchos residentes lo consideran un monumento vacío. “¿De qué sirve un edificio nuevo”, preguntó un padre, “si no hay suficientes maestros, programas ni servicios dentro?”
Una Junta de Educación sometida al alcalde
A diferencia de la mayoría de los distritos en Nueva Jersey, la Junta de Educación de Union City no es elegida por los ciudadanos. Es un distrito de Tipo I, lo que significa que sus siete miembros son designados directamente por el alcalde.
Este esquema otorga a Brian Stack un poder enorme sobre un sistema en el que, legalmente, no debería tener injerencia. En la práctica, Stack controla la junta y asegura que responda a él y no a los estudiantes.
El resultado es un distrito donde la lealtad política pesa más que la preparación profesional. Docentes y empleados denuncian una cultura de presión política constante, en la que las promociones y la estabilidad laboral dependen de las contribuciones a las campañas o del activismo a favor del alcalde.
Puestos de clientelismo: política sobre educación
Uno de los ejemplos más claros de estos nombramientos políticos es el cargo de Mercedes Joaquín, pareja de Stack, como directora de Relaciones Comunitarias del distrito. Para los críticos, se trata de un típico puesto clientelista: alto salario, funciones difusas y ningún beneficio directo para las aulas.
Otros aliados de Stack ocupan cargos similares, muchos de ellos creados artificialmente, consumiendo recursos que podrían pagar maestros, asistentes o programas estudiantiles.
Al mismo tiempo, empleados describen un ambiente de intimidación. Justin Mercado, secretario de la Junta, ha sido acusado de acosar a los trabajadores, presionarlos para hacer contribuciones políticas y silenciar a quienes se oponen. Los maestros afirman que se ven obligados a “jugar a la política” simplemente para conservar sus empleos.
Los estudiantes, las verdaderas víctimas
Los más perjudicados en este esquema son los niños de Union City. Mientras los allegados al poder cobran salarios y se premia la lealtad política, los estudiantes quedan sin transporte, sin programas extracurriculares y sin apoyos adecuados en educación especial.
Los padres y contribuyentes exigen respuestas. Con casi 400 millones de dólares a su disposición, ¿cómo puede el distrito seguir diciendo que no tiene dinero? ¿Por qué siempre se recortan maestros y programas, pero nunca los puestos políticos creados para beneficio de los aliados del alcalde?
Conclusión: Urge rendición de cuentas
Las escuelas de Union City deberían ser un ejemplo de éxito — una prueba de lo que puede lograrse cuando una comunidad recibe un fuerte respaldo estatal. En cambio, se han convertido en una advertencia de lo que ocurre cuando la política reemplaza a la profesionalidad.
El alcalde Brian Stack y su Junta de Educación, elegida a dedo, han creado un sistema en el que primero va el clientelismo, y al final los estudiantes. El distrito ya no puede esconderse detrás de excusas sobre la pandemia o la política federal. La verdad es más simple y demoledora: la crisis de Union City es autoinfligida, producto de la mala gestión y la corrupción política.
Hasta que se reforme el distrito y se rompa el control del alcalde sobre la educación, los niños de Union City seguirán pagando el precio más alto: su futuro.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN
SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.
The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:
Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct
Every single charge is now gone.
⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart
This wasn’t just one case.
Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.
This isn’t random.
Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.
👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.
The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.
🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire
This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.
Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:
– Understanding basic constitutional rights
– Proper handling of public meetings
– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings
Let’s break it down simply:
– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.
– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism
– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections
Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.
👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:
Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?
Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.
⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence
Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:
– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.
– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .
– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.
These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.
And now, it’s happening again.
🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case
These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.
Yes, there are rules.
Yes, meetings need order.
But the law is clear:
👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.
That’s where the line is.
And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.
🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore
Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.
Some see him as a watchdog.
Others see him as disruptive.
But here’s what actually matters:
👉 The charges are not sticking.
And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.
📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police
No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.
When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:
– Wastes public resources
– Damages the department’s credibility
– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making
And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.
👉 It becomes a pattern.
🧠 Bottom Line
This case is over.
The charges are dismissed.
But the real issue remains:
👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?
Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.
Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.
What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges
Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.
The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.
Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed
According to the complaint records reviewed:
Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.



Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .


Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.


Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.



The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.
Allegations Regarding the Incident
According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.
It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.
Political Reaction and Public Criticism
The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.
Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.
None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.
Court Process Ahead
The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.
Presumption of Innocence
All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.
Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City
A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.
Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.
More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Breaking News6 months agoJimmy Davis Can’t Run From the Truth: The People Deserve to Know Who He Really Is
-
Breaking News12 months agoA Closer Look at Jamie Chebra: Former Jersey City EMS Leader’s Past and Present Under Scrutiny
-
Breaking News1 year agoUNION CITY POLICE OFFICER FERNANDO MURO IS FAMOUS!
-
Breaking News6 months agoBREAKING: Scandal Erupts Inside Hudson County Sheriff’s Office — Lt. Fedrow Found Guilty of Sexual Misconduct, County Officials Accused of Political Protection
-
Breaking News1 year agoA History Lesson of Corruption in Union City
-
Breaking News1 year ago🔥🚔 BREAKING: UNION CITY POLICE CHIEF ANTHONY FACCHINI IS A DISGRACE! OFFICERS WANT HIM GONE IMMEDIATELY! 🚔🔥
-
Breaking News1 year agoRepublican Assembly Candidate Condemns Brian Stack Letter, Calls for Term Limits
-
Breaking News1 year agoPBA No Confidence Vote for Union City Police Chief Anthony Facchini
