Breaking News
Union City Political Machine Under Federal Spotlight: The Federalist Reports
October 2025 — A Cascade of Allegations Brings Long-Standing Concerns Into the Light
This election season, Union City, New Jersey, became the stage for renewed allegations of election misconduct tied to the 20-plus year political machine led by Brian Stack, the city’s mayor and a State Senator. What had been whispered concerns and dormant investigations have now drawn broader attention from national election-integrity stakeholders, suggesting the possibility of a wider federal inquiry.
Sources speaking to The Federalist describe a systematic pattern: campaign activity on government property, electioneering in protected zones, intimidation of city employees and residents, and a “pay-to-play” culture embedded in local campaigns.
“You’re going to do what the political boss asks you to do.” — a city insider quoted in the article.
One allegation involves campaign signage placed within 100 feet of a mobile early-voting site — a location where, under New Jersey election law, solicitation or campaign activity is prohibited. Other disclosures include government employees, ostensibly counting or investigating ballots, telling a resident that his city-services bill would be paid — if he registered and voted for Stack-backed candidates, then handed out campaign flyers.
Of particular concern to federal oversight bodies is that these practices, if proven, could constitute violations not only of state election law but potentially of federal statutes around voter intimidation and election-manipulation.
Long-Rooted Concerns, Amplified
Observers say the Union City “turnout machine” is no new phenomenon. In fact, Stack’s hold over local politics — described by one source as having “the trifecta” of executive, legislative and judicial influence — has been flagged for years. A 2014 report from Transparency NJ noted that Stack’s administration settled a lawsuit alleging retaliation and “a political machine to foster a ‘pay to play’ culture” tied to donations and government privileges.
What has changed this year is scale and visibility. The convergence of early-voting expansions (which Union City pays to operate extra mobile sites) and campaign visibility near these sites has drawn sharp criticism that the system is being used to advantage a dominant political bloc. One city in the same county, North Bergen, has already filed suit alleging the imbalance “clearly creates an advantage for Union City.”
Why “This Election” Really Matters
Several factors elevate the spring of 2025 and early general election in October as a pivotal moment:
The proliferation of mobile early-voting trailer sites in Union City — up to 10 — which the city funds and deploys, giving Stack’s machine broader reach into community turnout. The documented presence of signage and campaign-material within legally protected zones around voting locations — a red flag for election-law enforcement. Growing involvement of national Republican election-integrity operations in monitoring the county and state, elevating local allegations into the federal spotlight. Direct accounts from current candidates and city employees like EMT and Assembly-candidate Marco Navarro for LD-37, who told The Federalist that he was told by local Democrats he needed Stack’s approval to run in his 2019 candidacy for Hudson County Freeholder. A title now changed to Commissioner.
Together, these developments suggest that a political machine once operating largely with impunity may now face renewed scrutiny at higher levels of government.
The Stack Factor
Brian Stack — Mayor of Union City and State Senator for New Jersey’s 33rd district — is at the heart of the controversy. His critics and numerous sources portrayed him as “the human turnout machine” whose force in local politics creates high barriers to challengers and considerable leverage over city employees and residents.
Stack did not respond to The Federalist’s multiple requests for comment. His dual role as mayor and state senator, along with chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee, poses additional questions about how local campaign and legislative power may intertwine.
While previous lawsuits have alleged wrongdoing by Stack or his associates — for example, the 2014 retaliation case — none have resulted in criminal findings. That fact does not mean investigators have dismissed the concerns; rather, it means that these long-standing patterns of political control have remained largely intact.
What’s At Stake
For citizens: The allegations revolve around fundamental election-integrity issues — fairness, free choice, non-intimidated voting. If city employees or services are being used as leverage to secure votes, the very premise of a free election is undermined.
For New Jersey politics: Union City is a Democratic stronghold. But if dominance is maintained via suspect practices, the democratic process is compromised. The presence of mobile voting trailers, backed by city funds, raises far-reaching questions about equitable access to vote across jurisdictions.
For federal oversight: With national election-integrity groups and the Republican National Committee reportedly observing the situation, these allegations may invite federal investigations or enforcement attention. If federal election statutes are implicated, the stakes rise significantly.
Looking Ahead
The spotlight on Union City this spring may mark a turning point. Investigators, watchdogs and the media are watching closely. If credible evidence emerges that local government resources are being directed to partisan campaigns, if campaign activity is occurring in protected election zones, or if civic services are being conditioned on voter behavior — then this machine could face real accountability.
For candidates outside Stack’s bloc, this represents a rare opening. For public-servants and activists advocating transparency and term-limits as Navarro’s main campaign message, this moment may offer concrete case studies of entrenched power and possible reform pathways.
Only time will tell whether this national-level attention translates into enforcement, reform or merely another news cycle. What is clear: the events of the 2025 election have sharpened focus on a system that many believed immune from scrutiny.