Connect with us

Breaking News

NJ’s Politically-Motivated Witch Hunt Exposed: Supreme Court Forces AG’s Office to Admit It Targeted a Pro-Life Group With Zero Complaints

Published

on

New Jersey’s Attorney General just got dragged into the national spotlight — and not in a good way.

During oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court on December 2, 2025, Justice Clarence Thomas forced a stunning admission out of the State: New Jersey launched an invasive probe into a pro-life nonprofit despite having ZERO complaints from the public.

Not one.

That’s not law enforcement. That’s political abuse of government power — and taxpayers foot the bill.

The AG’s Office Couldn’t Cite a Single Complaint

According to the NY Post’s reporting on the hearing, the state attorney admitted under questioning that they had no actual consumer complaints against First Choice Women’s Resource Centers.

Source: New York Post, 12/2/25 — “SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas forces NJ attorney to admit state targeted pro-life group with probe”

Politico and the Washington Post independently reported the same stunning fact during the same hearing.

Sources:

Politico, 12/2/25 — “Justices seem poised to side with crisis pregnancy centers in NJ subpoena fight” Washington Post, 12/2/25 — “Supreme Court sympathetic to antiabortion center in fight over donor names”

So why did the Attorney General issue subpoenas demanding:

internal organizational documents, donor names and addresses, personal data on clients, and years of private records?

The answer wasn’t law.

It was politics.

Weaponizing Government to Punish Ideological Opponents

New Jersey’s AG did not open this investigation based on facts, complainants, victims, or any form of public harm.

They opened it because the nonprofit holds a political position the administration disagrees with.

That means the machinery of the State — subpoenas, investigators, legal teams, staff hours, and court filings — was deployed not to solve a crime, but to crush an opposing viewpoint.

HudTruth has been reporting for years that the Attorney General’s Office has been increasingly politicized and selective in who it prosecutes, who it investigates, and who it conveniently ignores.

This case is the most public proof yet.

Taxpayer Money Used to Fund a Political Fishing Expedition

Make no mistake — these subpoenas weren’t cheap.

Every hour the AG wasted on this politically-motivated probe was paid for by the public.

How much money was spent on this?

How many staffers were involved?

How many other legitimate investigations sat on the back burner so the AG could chase an ideological trophy?

The public has a right to those answers.

A Direct Threat to Civil Liberties

Even Supreme Court justices who rarely agree with each other expressed concern with the State’s extreme tactics.

The Washington Post reported that multiple justices questioned why New Jersey demanded donor names — a move that could intimidate supporters and chill First Amendment rights.

Source: Washington Post, 12/2/25

Justice Alito noted that donor disclosure in politically charged contexts has historically been struck down as unconstitutional.

Justice Kavanaugh expressed skepticism that the state had any legitimate purpose without complaints.

But Justice Thomas got to the core:

“How can you justify this subpoena when you have no complaints at all?”

The State had no answer — because there is no answer.

This Is a Blueprint for Government Retaliation

Regardless of where anyone stands on abortion, every resident should be disgusted that New Jersey’s highest law-enforcement office is acting like a political hit squad.

If they can do this to a pro-life charity, they can do it to:

labor unions, police organizations, immigrant groups, school-parent associations, faith-based charities, or any nonprofit that criticizes the powerful.

This is how civil liberties die — not in one dramatic moment, but in a slow creep of government agencies learning they can target their critics without consequences.

Where Is the Oversight?

New Jersey lawmakers should be demanding:

a full accounting of how much taxpayer money was blown, who authorized the subpoenas, what internal review occurred, and whether political actors pressured the AG to pursue this case.

But given New Jersey’s entrenched political alliances, don’t expect that to happen without public pressure.

HudTruth Will Be Filing OPRA Requests

HudTruth Media will be filing multiple OPRA requests demanding:

internal emails on the opening of this investigation, communications between the AG’s Office and the Governor’s Office, cost breakdowns of the legal work done, and any internal memos justifying the subpoenas.

If the state has nothing to hide, they can release the documents.

But based on what we saw at the Supreme Court, they have plenty to hide.

Conclusion: This Was Political Retaliation, Pure and Simple

The Supreme Court oral arguments revealed what New Jersey hoped no one would notice:

The investigation wasn’t based on facts.

It wasn’t based on law.

It wasn’t based on evidence.

It was based on political motivation — and paid for with the public’s money.

This is exactly the kind of government weaponization HudTruth was created to expose.

And we will continue digging.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations