The HudPost ‘s Smear Job on Leroy Truth a.ka., Leonard Filipowski, Is a Blatant Manipulation

The HudPost article targeting Leroy Truth a.ka., Leonard Filipowski, is not just misleading—it’s a calculated, agenda-driven attack aimed at discrediting him. The article falsely claims that he is not listed or credited on Grammy-winning albums, when in fact, Leonard Filipowski is clearly credited as a composer, lyricist, and pianist on multiple Grammy Award-winning albums by Jimmy Sturr and His Orchestra.

This intentional deception coincides with efforts by Brian P. Stack —Union City’s mayor, state senator, and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee—to suppress any opposition to his political machine. This isn’t about music or journalistic integrity; it’s a politically motivated hit job against investigative journalist Leroy Truth for investigating and exposing Mayor and Senator Brian Stack’s corruption!.

---

Exposing HudPost’s Deception and Political Motivations

1. They Claim He Wasn’t Credited—That’s a Flat-Out Lie

The HudPost article falsely asserts that Leonard Filipowski isn’t listed on any Grammy-winning albums.

Fact:
✅ Leonard Filipowski is officially credited on multiple Grammy-winning albums.

Example:
He composed and wrote the lyrics for the title track of I Love to Polka (1995), which won the Grammy for Best Polka Album in 1996.

This is an indisputable fact that HudPost conveniently ignores to maintain their narrative.

---

2. They Omit His Contributions as a Pianist

The HudPost article deliberately omits that Leonard Filipowski is a credited pianist on multiple Grammy-winning albums.

Example:
He performed on Polka! All Night Long (1996), which won a Grammy in 1997.

His piano playing was integral to the album’s success, a fact that undermines HudPost’s smear campaign.

And here’s a fun fact they won’t tell you—during Leonard Filipowski’s piano solos on that very album, country music legend Willie Nelson lent his iconic vocals to the project. Yet another inconvenient truth HudPost chose to ignore.

---

3. They’re Not Reporting—They’re Running a Political Smear Campaign Against Leroy Truth

The article’s goal is to discredit Leroy Truth, an outspoken critic of Brian Stack and his political machine.

HudPost references Mayor Nick Sacco—a completely unrelated political figure—revealing their true agenda.

They use loaded language, selective omission, and falsehoods to create a misleading narrative.

Instead of presenting facts, they rely on misinformation to discredit Leroy Truth.

This clearly demonstrates that Brian Stack and his allies fear independent voices exposing their corrupt actions.

---

4. The Ironic Attack on Leroy Truth as an ‘Investigative Journalist’

HudPost sarcastically refers to Leroy Truth as an “investigative journalist” while engaging in poor journalistic practices themselves.

A real journalist checks facts; HudPost didn’t.

A real journalist presents all sides of a story; HudPost didn’t.

They merely echo the agenda of the political establishment, acting as a mouthpiece for Brian Stack’s machine.

---

5. They Exploit the Public’s Lack of Understanding About Grammy Awards

HudPost falsely assumes that only the bandleader receives Grammy recognition.

Fact:
✅ The Best Polka Album Grammy is awarded to the bandleader, but the album is a collaborative effort.
✅ Composers, lyricists, and musicians—like Leonard Filipowski—play crucial roles in Grammy-winning albums.

Example:
Leonard Filipowski wrote the title track of a Grammy-winning album, making his work fundamental to the album’s success.

HudPost ignores this reality because it doesn’t fit their dishonest narrative.

---

6. They Claim to Have Spoken to ‘The Grammys’—But Who?

HudPost vaguely claims they spoke to someone “at the Grammys” without naming their source.

Why is that important?

If they had an official statement, why didn’t they name the person or department?

Who at The Recording Academy allegedly said this? A spokesperson, a random intern, or no one at all?

No credible journalist leaves a claim like this unverified—so why did HudPost?

This is a classic propaganda tactic—appealing to authority without proof.

---

7. Grammy.com Confirms the Grammy Award Was for Jimmy Sturr AND His Orchestra

HudPost misleads readers into thinking the Grammy was only awarded to Jimmy Sturr personally, which is incorrect.

Fact:
✅ Grammy.com lists “Jimmy Sturr and His Orchestra” as the Grammy recipient.
✅ The orchestra won the Grammy for their albums.
✅ Leonard Filipowski was a pianist, composer, and lyricist for that orchestra on Grammy-winning albums.

If Jimmy Sturr AND His Orchestra won, and Leonard Filipowski was part of that orchestra, HudPost’s claim is unjustifiable.

---

HudPost’s Article Is Not Journalism—It’s Political Propaganda

A real journalist presents all the facts. HudPost refuses to do this.

If they were honest, they would acknowledge:

✅ Leonard Filipowski was a composer and lyricist on Grammy-winning albums.
✅ Leonard Filipowski was a pianist on Grammy-winning albums.
✅ Leonard Filipowski’s contributions helped those albums win Grammys.

But HudPost won’t admit the truth—because their goal isn’t truth; it’s protecting Brian Stack’s political empire and silencing critics like Leroy Truth.

---

Final Word: The HudPost Must Be Exposed and Held Accountable

📌 The HudPost deliberately published false information to attack Leroy Truth—a clear indication that this is a politically motivated hit piece.
📌 Their claims are provably false.
📌 Their article is nothing more than a manipulative attack piece.
📌 Their journalistic integrity is nonexistent.

The only fraud here is HudPost’s dishonest reporting.

It’s time to call them out for their blatant lies. Leonard Filipowski’s contributions are real, documented, and undeniable—and no amount of HudPost’s and Brian Stack’s political propaganda will change that.

Tonight, we recognize the Hudson County Sheriff’s Officers for their outstanding professionalism and de-escalation skills—handling a situation with respect and fairness, when so many other departments might have resorted to unnecessary force or arrest.

At a Hudson County Commissioners Meeting, a member of the public attended, expecting to speak during the public comment session, just as he has done at numerous other meetings. What he didn’t know was that Hudson County has an unconstitutional rule requiring people to email the commissioners 24 hours in advance to “ask permission” to speak at a public meeting.

There was no sign-up sheet, no posted notice, and no way for him to know about this rule.

The man waited all night, patiently sitting through the meeting, expecting his turn to speak. However, when he finally thought it was time, the commissioners voted to end public comment without giving him the chance to speak.

When the man rightfully protested being denied his voice, instead of calmly explaining their unconstitutional rule, one commissioner aggressively escalated the situation, immediately yelling at the man.

In many other places, this could have led to the man being tackled, tasered, or arrested. But instead, the Hudson County Sheriff’s Officers stepped in and demonstrated real de-escalation, true professionalism, and genuine respect for the public.

They quickly diffused the situation and engaged in a respectful conversation with the man, who simply wanted to exercise his right to speak. They listened, treated him with dignity, and by the end of the night, they were shaking hands and sharing a positive exchange.

Where other law enforcement agencies might have resorted to force or arrest, the Hudson County Sheriff’s Officers ensured the man went home feeling heard.

This is a direct reflection of the leadership of HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF FRANK SCHILLARI and LIEUTENANT RUIZ, who train their officers not just in law enforcement, but in true public service. Their officers showed tonight what it means to protect both public safety and the public’s constitutional rights.

Any police department can claim to support de-escalation and constitutional rights, but the Hudson County Sheriff’s Officers proved it tonight.

I am proud to know these officers and grateful for their dedication to serving the public with professionalism and integrity.

(Pictured: Some of the exceptional Hudson County, NJ Sheriff’s Officers who upheld the highest standards of professionalism tonight.)

In an unprecedented development, Hudson County is witnessing simultaneous votes of no confidence against two of its top public safety officials: Union City Police Chief Anthony Facchini and Jersey City Public Safety Director James Shea. These actions have raised significant concerns about internal department morale and public perception of law enforcement leadership.

Union City Police Chief Anthony Facchini

Chief Facchini, appointed in 2022, is currently facing a no-confidence vote initiated by the Union City Police Department’s Policemen’s Benevolent Association (PBA) Local 8. While specific details of the allegations have not been publicly disclosed, sources indicate that a majority of the association’s members are prepared to participate, reflecting deep-seated dissatisfaction within the ranks.

Jersey City Public Safety Director James Shea

Concurrently, the Jersey City Council has passed a resolution expressing no confidence in Public Safety Director James Shea. The resolution, approved by a 6-1 vote, cites concerns over Shea’s lack of responsiveness to council inquiries and perceived shortcomings in addressing public safety issues. Councilman Frank Gilmore, who sponsored the resolution, emphasized a “clear pattern of continuing to ignore the council” regarding safety measures for residents. 

Implications for Departmental Morale and Public Perception

Votes of no confidence are significant indicators of internal unrest within law enforcement agencies. They often stem from perceived leadership failures, mismanagement, or ethical concerns. Such votes can severely impact departmental morale, leading to decreased productivity, increased attrition, and a breakdown in the chain of command.

For the public, these votes can erode trust in law enforcement, fostering skepticism about the integrity and effectiveness of those sworn to protect and serve. Communities may question the commitment of their leaders to uphold justice and ensure public safety, leading to strained community-police relations.

The Role and Impact of No-Confidence Votes

A vote of no confidence serves as a formal expression of dissatisfaction by subordinates or governing bodies toward a leader. While typically symbolic, such votes can prompt administrative reviews, policy changes, or even the resignation or removal of the official in question. The International Association of Chiefs of Police notes that while these votes do not have legal force, they carry substantial weight in assessing a leader’s effectiveness and the overall health of an organization. 

Consequences for Professional Careers and Reputations

Enduring a no-confidence vote can have lasting repercussions on an official’s career and reputation. It publicly signals a breach in trust and questions the individual’s leadership capabilities. Such a vote can hinder future career prospects, diminish professional credibility, and lead to increased scrutiny from both the public and oversight bodies.

Conclusion

The concurrent no-confidence votes against Chief Facchini and Director Shea underscore significant challenges within Hudson County’s public safety leadership. Addressing the underlying issues prompting these votes is crucial for restoring internal morale, maintaining public trust, and ensuring the effective administration of justice.