Connect with us

Breaking News

NJ Teachers File Lawsuit: $40 Million in Union Dues Secretly Bankrolled NJEA President’s Failed Run for Governor

Published

on

TRENTON, N.J. – September 30, 2025 – A political scandal has erupted in New Jersey’s most powerful teachers’ union. Two veteran educators and a leading think tank have filed lawsuits and formal complaints accusing the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) of diverting more than $40 million in mandatory teacher dues into union president Sean Spiller’s unsuccessful campaign for governor.

Teachers Say NJEA Misled and Betrayed Members

In a lawsuit filed in Mercer County, Roselle teacher Dr. Marie Dupont and Hamilton Township teacher Ann Marie Pocklembo claim NJEA leaders broke their membership contracts, misrepresented political giving, and violated their fiduciary duty to members. The lawsuit alleges that teachers were told contributions to the union’s PAC were optional, but that NJEA insiders quietly funneled mandatory dues into political organizations to bankroll Spiller’s gubernatorial ambitions.

“When I signed my union membership card, I chose not to support the union’s PAC,” said Dupont, a mother of three and teacher for nearly two decades. “Then I discovered that $40 million of teachers’ dues—including mine—had been used for the union president’s campaign. That’s wrong, and I believe it’s illegal.”

Dupont has since resigned her NJEA membership.

Pocklembo, a teacher for 30 years, said: “It’s an obvious conflict of interest when the union president benefits from backroom deals to fund his own campaign with members’ money. It undermines trust and damages the union’s credibility.”

The Shell Game: Dues to PACs to Campaign

The lawsuit outlines how NJEA officials created and controlled Garden State Forward, a political entity funded with dues. That group then sent $40 million to Working New Jersey and Protecting Our Democracy, both run by union insiders, who used the money to promote Spiller’s campaign.

Despite the extraordinary spending, Spiller finished fifth in the Democratic primary, earning fewer than 90,000 votes. The cost amounted to over $400 per vote.

“This is textbook self-dealing,” said Nathan McGrath, president and general counsel of the Fairness Center, which represents the teachers. “The NJEA diverted mandatory dues into its president’s political campaign while misleading members into believing political giving was optional. That’s a breach of contract and a breach of trust.”

Think Tank Seeks Federal and State Investigations

The New Jersey Policy Institute (NJPI), also represented by the Fairness Center, filed complaints with both the IRS and the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC).

The IRS complaint argues that NJEA failed to disclose millions in political expenditures on its required tax forms, violating federal law. The ELEC complaint alleges the union evaded New Jersey’s $5,800 campaign contribution limit by splitting donations between multiple affiliated entities, giving Spiller’s campaign a combined $11,600.

“Union officials don’t get a pass on election or tax law,” said Rosemary Becchi, NJPI president. “We believe NJEA used a web of organizations to conceal its political spending and benefit its president personally. Teachers and taxpayers deserve accountability.”

The Stakes

The lawsuit, Dupont & Pocklembo v. NJEA & Spiller, seeks a ruling that the union violated its contract with members, made misrepresentations, and breached its fiduciary responsibilities. NJPI’s complaints ask for state and federal investigations into what could be one of the largest hidden diversions of union dues in New Jersey history.

At stake are thousands of teachers’ dues dollars, originally believed to support education, but allegedly redirected to political ambitions. The outcome could reshape trust in one of New Jersey’s most powerful political organizations.

Call to Action: If you have additional information regarding NJEA, Sean Spiller, or union dues misuse, contact Leroy Truth Investigations.
• Corruption Tips Hotline: 305-707-8325
• Email: LeroyTruth247@gmail.com
• Mailing Address: Leroy Truth – P.O. Box 3464, Stamford, CT 06905


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations