Connect with us

Breaking News

NJ Bill to Weaken Watchdog Powers Raises Red Flags — Especially for Politically Exposed Figures Like Union City, NJ Mayor and Senator Brian Stack

Published

on

TRENTON — A newly introduced bill aiming to strip part of the investigative authority from New Jersey’s Comptroller’s Office has sparked fierce criticism — and for good reason. Critics warn the legislation could embolden entrenched local political machines, including powerful figures such as Union City’s longtime mayor-senator Brian P. Stack.

On November 26, 2025, Office of the State Comptroller (OSC) Acting Comptroller Kevin Walsh called the measure a “scam” that threatens to let “corruption flourish unchecked.” The bill, introduced by Nicholas Scutari — Senate President and a top Democratic lawmaker — seeks to transfer the OSC’s investigative and subpoena powers to the State Commission of Investigation (SCI). Under the proposal, the Legislature would assume authority to appoint the SCI chair, significantly increasing the risk of politicizing oversight. 

“Reducing the power of the governor to address corruption, especially at the local level,” Walsh said, would “effectively kill all our ongoing investigations.” Among the work the OSC has flagged as potentially impacted are audits of public-contract abuse, misuse of pandemic-era funds, Medicaid oversight, and investigations into racial profiling and police misconduct. 

The timing has alarmed watchdog groups and good-governance advocates — but for some, it resonates all too clearly with longstanding concerns over political patronage and alleged corruption in cities like Union City, where Brian Stack has wielded outsized influence for decades.

Brian Stack & Union City — A History of Allegations, Controversy, and Political Clout

Brian P. Stack — who serves concurrently as mayor of Union City and a state senator — has long been a central figure in Hudson County politics. Over the years, critics and former opponents have accused him of leveraging municipal resources, public-aid funding, and state largesse to maintain a powerful political machine. 

👥 Past Controversies

Day-care grants under review (2007): Stack was subpoenaed in an investigation into the disbursement of two $100,000 grants awarded to Union City Day Care — a private entity headed by his estranged wife. The probe, triggered by conflict-of-interest complaints, lasted until 2009, when a state ethics panel cleared him. The panel concluded Stack did not personally benefit and no illegality occurred. 

Use of public vehicles and resources: In 2011, local media documented that Stack’s ex-wife was using a city-owned police vehicle (with free gas and insurance) to run the day-care center — a private institution. Additional questions arose about whether public-space rent was being waived. 

Allegations of patronage and misuse of state aid: Critics — including former opponents such as Nicholas J. Sacco — have publicly warned that Union City receives massive state aid (reportedly over $300 million) and that many of the positions funded may be political jobs rather than genuine public-service roles. Sacco has stated this isn’t just “political patronage” but “outright corruption.” 

Lawsuit settlements linked to alleged abuses of power: Union City has a history of settling lawsuits related to alleged wrongful arrests and harassment. One notable case involved a former ICE agent who claimed the city surveilled him, after which the city settled for $100,000. Another involved a former Newark police officer who alleged wrongful arrest and double jeopardy — the city settled for $67,000. In both cases, settlements were made without admissions of wrongdoing. 

Supporters of Stack argue many of these controversies were resolved in his favor — or involve unproven allegations — and emphasize the stability, services, and large immigrant-community representation he has provided to Union City. 

Other controversies surround Brian Stack with investigative journalist Leroy Truth, as he investigates over 5000 allegation corruption he’s received against Stack including paid to play, bribery, extortion, intimidation, sexual assault, sexual assault cover-ups and protection and promotion of the alleged sexual predators, direct voter intimidation by May and Senator stack two Union City employees, and much more,

Leroy Truth has been investigating, reporting and exposing Stack’s political corruption.

These matters have been previously reported by this outlet and remain ongoing.

Yet, to critics — and to reform-oriented watchdogs — Stack symbolizes exactly the kind of political concentration and machine-style governance that robust oversight institutions were designed to check.

Why the New Bill Matters — Especially for High-Risk Jurisdictions

If passed, the proposed legislation would effectively reduce the ability of the state to pursue corruption, waste, and abuse — especially in municipalities with entrenched power structures and histories of patronage. For places like Union City, this could mean fewer checks on how billions in state aid are distributed and whether public-resources are being diverted to political ends.

As Comptroller Walsh noted, OSC currently receives “hundreds of tips of public corruption and waste a month.” Many local officials and municipalities have flagged for investigation — including misuse of opioid-settlement funds, ghost-employee schemes, overpayments, and improper contract awards. 

Transferring those oversight responsibilities to a body with greater legislative control would reduce independence — and likely insulate powerful politicians who benefit from the current status quo.

Given the track record of allegations surrounding Brian Stack and Union City, adopting such a bill would appear to guarantee fewer external constraints on their ability to govern with minimal transparency or accountability.

What This Means for New Jersey — And Why Citizens Should Care

Transparency and accountability may suffer. This isn’t just about shifting bureaucratic boxes — it’s about who investigates whom. By shifting power to a body controlled by legislators, the bill makes oversight more political and less independent. Local patronage machines could be reinforced. Municipalities long criticized for patronage and favoritism — like Union City — may find fewer obstacles to maintain entrenched political networks. Taxpayer money becomes more vulnerable. Large state aid packages, grants, contracts — especially in high-aid municipalities — could be distributed with less scrutiny, increasing risk of waste, kickbacks, or unethical deals. Public trust erodes. For citizens concerned about fairness, equity and honest governance, weakening watchdog capabilities undermines confidence in public institutions.

Why the Eyes of Reformers Should Be on Brian Stack — and the Legislature

Whether the new bill becomes law or stalls in committee — as advocates hope — the episode underscores a crucial truth: New Jersey’s governance structure remains vulnerable to entrenched local power-brokers, especially in municipalities where political machines have long held sway.

Figures such as Brian Stack may not currently face active indictments — but history shows that oversight, transparency and institutional checks are the only reliable barrier to abuse of power.

If this bill passes, the risk is real: local governments shielded from scrutiny, state dollars diverted with little oversight, and corruption thriving in plain sight.

For the people of Union City — and across the Garden State — the fight for accountable government may be shifting from courtrooms and ethics panels to the legislative halls of Trenton.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations