Breaking News
Union City Schools in Crisis: What the Court Found — and Who’s at Fault
Background: Allegations, Assault, and Abuse of Trust
In 2004, a softball coach and gym teacher employed by Union City High School, Francisco Realpe, sexually assaulted two female students — including Jessica Garcia. Over 15 years later, in 2025, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a landmark ruling in Garcia / Jane Doe v. Union City Board of Education (A-2404-24 & A-0338-25), clarifying the legal liability of the BOE for those abuses.
The case revealed that school officials had multiple warnings and “red flags” about Realpe’s behavior — but failed to act, supervise, or protect students under their care. The survivors’ suit alleged negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and a hostile educational environment under anti-discrimination laws.
What the Court Found — UC BOE’s Legal Failures
The court recognized that the board “had reason to know” about Realpe’s misconduct but “failed to appropriately supervise, investigate, or remove him.” It held that under the 2019 Child Victims Act (CVA), claims like those of Garcia and Jane Doe — including hostile-environment claims under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD) — are revived and may proceed, even though the abuse occurred decades earlier.
The court rejected arguments that the board is automatically shielded simply because the abuser was an employee. Because the assaults were “outside the scope of employment,” the board is not automatically vicariously liable — but can be liable for negligent supervision/hiring and for failing to maintain a safe environment.
The decision therefore makes clear that the board’s protective shield cannot hide deliberate inaction or willful neglect.

In Plain Terms: What This Means for Students and the Public:
1. Liability for sexual abuse
The BOE cannot claim blanket immunity just because the abuser was “on staff.” If school officials ignored known risks, they can be sued.
2. Time-barred claims revived
Under the 2019 CVA, victims like Jessica Garcia can still hold the BOE accountable — even for assaults from 2004.
3. Board failures exposed
The court found strong evidence that UC BOE ignored warnings and failed to protect children.
4. Potential for accountability
Negligent-hiring, negligent-supervision, and hostile-environment claims remain alive — the Board could face damages or be forced to reform.
As one legal summary put it: the decision confirms that “school districts may be held liable for failing to protect students from sexual abuse by employees,” even if the abuse occurred outside the scope of employment.
Responsibility Doesn’t Stop at the Board — The Mayor Appoints the Board
It matters that the UC BOE isn’t elected by the public. Union City is a Type I school district — meaning all seven board trustees are appointed by the mayor, not elected.
That puts final responsibility on Mayor Brian P. Stack. Over the years, he has appointed successive boards — including the very trustees who failed to protect children. In effect, Stack has enormous leverage over a system that should serve students and families.
In past years, this patronage-based appointment system has already drawn criticism — with observers arguing the BOE “serves him, not the students.”
Put simply: If the BOE failed, then the mayor — who chooses the board — must share responsibility.
Why This Ruling Matters — and Why the Public Should Care
For decades, many sexual-abuse victims in school districts like Union City believed they had no recourse because of immunity protections or because too much time had passed. That is no longer true.
From Union City to Jersey City: Continued to Victimize
In 2023, the former Union City and Jersey City teacher, Francisco Realpe, was sentenced to four years in state prison after pleading guilty to sexually assaulting two students — one in 2004 at a Union City high school and another in 2019. That 2004 victim is the same Jessica Garcia whose 2021 lawsuit helped bring to light the institutional failures at Union City. The fact that Realpe remained employed — despite multiple warnings about “unhealthy relationships with students” — exposes deep negligence by the UC BOE, which failed to investigate or remove a known predator after red flags were raised by teachers and supervisors.

The 2025 ruling:
Reinforces that school boards can — and must — be held accountable for protecting students. Serves as a warning to other districts: ignoring credible warning signs about staff behavior can expose districts to liability. Raises urgent questions about governance: should appointed boards be replaced by elected ones? Should mayors appoint their supporters to boards overseeing student safety?
For parents, students, taxpayers — and voters — the message is unmistakable: “No more excuses. If you control the board, you are responsible.”
What We Know About the Victim — and Why Her Fight Matters
One of the plaintiffs, Jessica Garcia, survived the abuse and pursued justice. Coverage from local outlets describes her as a former student victim who bravely came forward.
Her lawsuit — filed under the revived CVA window — forced the issue into court, uncovered long-buried failures, and given new hope to other survivors in Union City and across New Jersey.
Her victory isn’t just about money — it’s about exposing institutional failure and demanding accountability from public officials entrusted with children’s safety.
What This Case Means to Other Victims:
In recent weeks, two former Union City students, Jonathan Almeida and Michael Torres, have come forward publicly in live social-media interviews, alleging that current Union City vice principal and former high-school football coach Edwin Marinez exposed himself to them when they were student-athletes at Emerson High School. These allegations — which remain unproven and have not yet resulted in formal charges — echo the same pattern of institutional neglect revealed in the Jessica Garcia case, where the Appellate Division found substantial evidence that school officials failed to act on warnings about predatory behavior.
The Garcia ruling now establishes a powerful legal foundation for survivors: if Almeida’s and Torres’s allegations are ever corroborated, the precedent confirming that school districts can be sued for negligent supervision, failure to investigate, and maintaining a hostile educational environment will directly strengthen their path to justice, accountability, and systemic reform.
Takeaway — What You Should Do, and Demand
Demand a public accounting: The community should require the BOE and the Mayor’s office to explain how Realpe was hired, supervised, and why the warnings were ignored. Advocate for reform: Appointed boards like UC’s create accountability loopholes.
The public should consider supporting a switch to an elected school board structure. Support survivors: The ruling shows that past abuse is no longer hidden; victims should feel empowered to come forward. Hold elected officials responsible: If you live in Union City or Hudson County, remember — the Mayor makes the appointments. Leaders like Brian Stack must answer for board failures.
Conclusion
The Appellate Division’s decision in Garcia / Jane Doe v. Union City BOE lays bare a decades-long pattern of neglect, silence, and institutional protectionism. It shows that legal reforms — like the 2019 Child Victims Act — can and must be used to hold public institutions accountable. But legal tools alone are not enough.
True accountability requires public pressure, civic engagement, and — ultimately — structural change. If appointed boards are going to shield abusers and ignore warning signs, then maybe it’s time the public takes back control.
The victims spoke. The court ruled. It is now the community’s turn to act.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN
SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.
The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:
Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct
Every single charge is now gone.
⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart
This wasn’t just one case.
Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.
This isn’t random.
Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.
👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.
The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.
🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire
This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.
Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:
– Understanding basic constitutional rights
– Proper handling of public meetings
– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings
Let’s break it down simply:
– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.
– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism
– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections
Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.
👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:
Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?
Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.
⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence
Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:
– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.
– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .
– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.
These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.
And now, it’s happening again.
🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case
These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.
Yes, there are rules.
Yes, meetings need order.
But the law is clear:
👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.
That’s where the line is.
And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.
🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore
Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.
Some see him as a watchdog.
Others see him as disruptive.
But here’s what actually matters:
👉 The charges are not sticking.
And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.
📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police
No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.
When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:
– Wastes public resources
– Damages the department’s credibility
– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making
And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.
👉 It becomes a pattern.
🧠 Bottom Line
This case is over.
The charges are dismissed.
But the real issue remains:
👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?
Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.
Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.
What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges
Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.
The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.
Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed
According to the complaint records reviewed:
Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.



Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .


Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.


Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.



The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.
Allegations Regarding the Incident
According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.
It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.
Political Reaction and Public Criticism
The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.
Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.
None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.
Court Process Ahead
The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.
Presumption of Innocence
All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.
Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City
A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.
Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.
More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.
Discover more from HUDTRUTH
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Breaking News6 months agoJimmy Davis Can’t Run From the Truth: The People Deserve to Know Who He Really Is
-
Breaking News12 months agoA Closer Look at Jamie Chebra: Former Jersey City EMS Leader’s Past and Present Under Scrutiny
-
Breaking News1 year agoUNION CITY POLICE OFFICER FERNANDO MURO IS FAMOUS!
-
Breaking News6 months agoBREAKING: Scandal Erupts Inside Hudson County Sheriff’s Office — Lt. Fedrow Found Guilty of Sexual Misconduct, County Officials Accused of Political Protection
-
Breaking News1 year agoA History Lesson of Corruption in Union City
-
Breaking News1 year ago🔥🚔 BREAKING: UNION CITY POLICE CHIEF ANTHONY FACCHINI IS A DISGRACE! OFFICERS WANT HIM GONE IMMEDIATELY! 🚔🔥
-
Breaking News1 year agoRepublican Assembly Candidate Condemns Brian Stack Letter, Calls for Term Limits
-
Breaking News1 year agoPBA No Confidence Vote for Union City Police Chief Anthony Facchini
