Connect with us

Breaking News

Op-Ed: Questions Remain inside the NBPD

Published

on

If you live in North Bergen or Hudson County, you should read this.

Quiet retirement. Growing questions.

Deputy Chief David Corbisiero recently retired from the North Bergen Police Department – and inside township government, multiple sources say the circumstances behind it have become an “open secret.”

My latest investigation for The Exposure Report looks at what led up to the retirement, concerns surrounding Internal Affairs practices, and why many believe the story isn’t finished yet.

Read the full report below.

Quiet Exit, Unanswered Questions: Inside the Retirement of North Bergen Deputy Chief

David Corbisiero

By David Snow – The Exposure Report

A sudden leadership change inside the North Bergen Police Department is raising questions among officers, township employees, and residents about what may have happened behind the scenes.

Deputy Chief David Corbisiero recently filed for retirement, a move that occurred quietly and without a detailed public explanation. Leadership changes are not uncommon in law enforcement agencies, though multiple sources within township government and the police department say the circumstances surrounding this retirement may be tied to a deeper internal conflict that had been escalating within the department.

Internal Affairs Concerns

According to several sources familiar with internal department dynamics, concerns had been raised by some officers about how Internal Affairs investigations were being conducted.

Internal Affairs units are intended to operate independently and impartially when investigating complaints against officers. In the North Bergen Police Department, multiple sources say the Internal Affairs function was supervised and overseen within the department’s chain of command by Deputy Chief David Corbisiero.

Multiple sources say some members of the department had begun raising concerns that Internal Affairs processes were being used in ways they believed were retaliatory and, in certain cases, discriminatory toward specific officers.

Several sources also allege that some of the complaints used to initiate Internal Affairs investigations were not only retaliatory but, in their view, outright false, raising further concerns among officers about how disciplinary mechanisms were being used within the department.

Those concerns reportedly intensified in recent months and became a significant source of tension within the department.

New Jersey’s Attorney General guidelines governing Internal Affairs require that investigations be conducted fairly, objectively, and free from retaliation, standards designed to ensure accountability while protecting officers from improper disciplinary practices.

Potential Legal Action

Sources say the situation escalated to the point where potential legal action was being explored by at least one senior member of the department.

Under New Jersey law, individuals seeking to bring claims against a public entity or public employee must first file a tort claim notice, generally within 90 days of the alleged conduct.

Several sources familiar with the situation say such a filing was being considered before the deputy chief’s retirement occurred.

No tort claim notice has been publicly filed as of this writing.

A Quiet Exit

Shortly before any legal action could move forward, Deputy Chief Corbisiero retired from the department.

Multiple sources describe the retirement as the result of discussions involving township leadership and department personnel aimed at resolving a growing internal dispute before it escalated further.

Township officials have not publicly explained the circumstances leading to the retirement.

Who Will Lead the Department Next?

The retirement has also created an immediate leadership question inside the department.

The North Bergen Police Department currently has six captains, any of whom could potentially be considered for promotion to the rank of deputy chief.

However, as of now, no replacement has been announced, and township officials have not provided a timeline for when the position will be filled.

In most police departments, command vacancies are typically addressed quickly in order to maintain stability within the chain of command.

The delay has raised additional questions among officers and township employees about what factors may be influencing the decision.

Political Context

The situation is unfolding as township leadership looks ahead to the next municipal election cycle in 2027, when all seats on the township’s governing commission – including the position of mayor — will once again be on the ballot.

In North Bergen’s commission form of government, the mayor is selected from among the five commissioners elected by voters to serve four-year terms.

Leadership disputes within a police department can carry significant implications in any municipality, particularly as administrations consider long-term stability within key departments.

The Timeline Behind the Retirement

Several sources familiar with the situation say the timing of the retirement may be significant because of legal deadlines connected to potential claims.

Under New Jersey law, individuals who intend to bring legal claims against a public entity or public employee must first file a tort claim notice, which generally must be submitted within 90 days of the alleged conduct.

Sources say that before the deputy chief’s retirement, the possibility of such a filing had been discussed within the department.

At the same time, administrative rules governing public employee retirements can allow a short window in which certain retirement decisions may potentially be revisited or rescinded.

The overlap between those timelines has created a narrow period in which both the potential legal claim and the retirement decision remain within their respective deadlines.

Several sources say the timing has become a topic of discussion among municipal employees and members of the department.

Whether those deadlines played any role in the timing of the retirement has not been publicly addressed by township officials.

An Open Secret

Inside the township, the circumstances surrounding the deputy chief’s departure have become widely discussed among municipal employees and members of the police department.

Several township sources described the situation as “an open secret” within local government circles.

Despite that, no official explanation has been offered publicly regarding the events leading to the leadership change.

Questions That Remain

The retirement of Deputy Chief Corbisiero leaves several key questions unanswered:

What led to the sudden retirement of the deputy chief?

Were concerns about Internal Affairs practices a factor in the dispute described by sources?

Why has no successor been named despite multiple captains in the department?

And will additional details about the situation become public in the coming weeks?

Township officials have not publicly addressed the circumstances surrounding the retirement or provided an explanation for the delay in naming a successor.

Yet among those who work within township government and the police department, few believe the story behind the retirement will remain buried for long.

The Test of Leadership

Whatever the circumstances that led to Deputy Chief David Corbisiero’s departure, the moment now presents an opportunity for township leadership to reinforce a culture of accountability within the North Bergen Police Department.

Law enforcement agencies function best when officers know that raising concerns about internal practices will be taken seriously rather than discouraged. As the township considers who will fill the vacant deputy chief position, many within the department say the decision will send a clear message about the future direction of leadership – whether integrity, transparency, and the willingness to speak up in the face of internal problems are values that will be recognized and strengthened within the department.

For now, the retirement has closed one chapter inside the North Bergen Police Department. But according to several sources within township government and the department, the story behind what led to it may only be beginning.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Breaking News

Charges Against “Leroy Truth” Dismissed in Secaucus Court — Another Embarrassing Loss for Union City Police..AGAIN

Published

on

SECAUCUS, NJ — In another courtroom defeat, all charges against investigative journalist Leonard “Leroy Truth” Filipowski have been dismissed by the Secaucus Municipal Court.

The charges — filed after incidents tied to Union City public meetings — included:

Disrupting a public meeting Defiant trespass Disorderly conduct

Every single charge is now gone.

⚖️ Another Case Falls Apart

This wasn’t just one case.

Charges brought forward by Officer Ivis Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy have now both been dismissed, continuing a pattern where cases against Leroy Truth fail to hold up in court.

This isn’t random.

Multiple cases tied to his activism and reporting have reportedly ended the same way — dismissed or dropped. While a full official count of outcomes isn’t independently confirmed in one place, the repeated results are hard to ignore.

👉 At some point, it stops looking like coincidence.

The Secaucus Municipal Prosecutor commented during the court hearing stating that “we must stop trying to chill free speech with these charges”, as charges were being dismissed.

🚨 Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy Under Fire

This case puts a spotlight directly on Officer I. Arias and Sgt. Jasen Bellamy, whose charges ultimately collapsed in court.

Critics are now raising serious concerns about both officers, particularly when one is a supervisor, especially when it comes to:

– Understanding basic constitutional rights

– Proper handling of public meetings

– Knowing the limits of police authority in First Amendment settings

Let’s break it down simply:

– Police cannot remove someone just for speaking out.

– They cannot stretch disorderly conduct laws to cover criticism

– They cannot use trespass charges to bypass constitutional protections

Those are not advanced legal concepts — those are fundamentals.

👉 When both officers’ cases get dismissed, the question becomes unavoidable:

Were these arrests based on law — or poor judgment? Do these officers actually understand the law they were enforcing or were they enforcing their feelings?

Officer Arias is also the mistress of Captain Omar Hernandez, who ordered the first arrest of Leroy Truth for “disrespecting the commissioners” in a public commissioners meeting. Another charge that has been previously dismissed on constitutional grounds.

⚠️ Bigger Questions About Leadership and Influence

Beyond the officers themselves, critics are pointing to larger issues inside the department, including:

– Allegations that enforcement actions in political settings are being pushed from higher up.

– Concerns that officers are being placed in situations without proper legal guidance or training .

– Ongoing questions about internal relationships and influence.

These concerns have not been proven in court — but they continue to resurface every time another case falls apart.

And now, it’s happening again.

🏛️ This Isn’t Just About One Case

These incidents all stem from public meetings — places where people are supposed to challenge government openly.

Yes, there are rules.

Yes, meetings need order.

But the law is clear:

👉 You cannot punish someone simply for being critical or outspoken during their public comment time.

That’s where the line is.

And based on the outcome in court, that line may have been crossed.

🎯 A Pattern That’s Getting Hard to Ignore

Leroy Truth has consistently criticized Union City leadership, including Mayor Brian Stack.

Some see him as a watchdog.

Others see him as disruptive.

But here’s what actually matters:

👉 The charges are not sticking.

And now, with cases tied to both Officer Arias and Sgt. Bellamy dismissed, the pattern becomes even harder to dismiss as coincidence.

📉 A Bad Look for Union City Police

No matter how you look at it, this is a problem.

When multiple officers bring cases that don’t survive in court, it:

– Wastes public resources

– Damages the department’s credibility

– Raises serious concerns about training and decision-making

And when it happens repeatedly — it becomes more than just a mistake.

👉 It becomes a pattern.

🧠 Bottom Line

This case is over.

The charges are dismissed.

But the real issue remains:

👉 Why do these cases keep failing — especially when brought by multiple officers like Arias and Bellamy?

Chief Walter Laurencio needs to take a closer look at officers abusing the criminal justice system with frivolous charges. At the end of the day it falls under his watch.

Until that question is answered, every future arrest tied to public criticism will face the same scrutiny — from the public and from the courts.

What’s the score now with total criminal charges dismissed…Leroy wins 28-0 in court so far!


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Stack’s Campaign Confrontation Leads to Criminal Charges

Published

on

Court complaint records show that several individuals have been criminally charged following an confrontation involving an investigative journalist, Scalzo Photo, during a political campaign event in Union City in the summer of 2025.

The complaint documents indicate that the incident is connected to activities surrounding a political campaign event attended by supporters and volunteers of Mayor and State Senator Brian P. Stack.

Individuals Named in Complaint Records and Charges Listed

According to the complaint records reviewed:

Andre Stevens is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). After physically shoving the journalist onto a vehicle and strangling him.

Ernesto J. Ferrera-Robles is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). This individual is seen to purposely follow the journalist throughout the entire event blowing air horns in the ears of the Journalist .

Luis R. Beltran is listed as charged with third-degree aggravated assault — attempt to cause significant bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7). Also followed and harassed the journalist with an airhorn.

Elisa T. Cuenca is listed as charged with third-degree criminal mischief involving alleged property damage exceeding statutory limits under N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3(a)(1). Also followed and harassed the journalist by consistently blocking the camera view and his personal view with a Campaign sign, a consistently impeding his way of travel.

The complaint records reference offense dates in June 2025 and appear to stem from the same overall police investigation.

Allegations Regarding the Incident

According to allegations described by individuals familiar with the matter, the confrontation occurred while an investigative journalist was documenting campaign activities. It is alleged that campaign volunteers followed the journalist, blocked camera views using political signs, and attempted to intimidate him from reporting on the event.

It is further alleged that at one point a volunteer physically confronted the journalist, including grabbing and pushing him against a vehicle. These allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

Political Reaction and Public Criticism

The incident has generated political controversy and public criticism. Some critics argue that campaign leadership and elected officials connected to the event should have ensured a safe environment for journalists and members of the public.

Criticism has also been directed at prominent political figures associated with the campaign, including Mayor and State Senator Brian Stack, as well as Assemblyman Larry Wainstein and Assemblyman Gabriel Rodriguez, with opponents alleging a failure to prevent or discourage confrontational conduct by supporters.

None of these public officials are listed as defendants in the complaint records reviewed and none has made comments of the incident.

Court Process Ahead

The charged individuals are expected to appear in court as the cases move through the criminal justice process. The proceedings will determine whether the charges proceed to indictment, trial, dismissal, or other resolution.

Presumption of Innocence

All charges described in the complaint records are allegations only.

Each named individual is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law following due process.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Fatal Shooting Under Investigation on Bergenline Avenue in Union City

Published

on

A man was found shot and killed early this morning between parked vehicles near the intersection of 44th Street and Bergen Avenue in Union City. Authorities from the Union City Police Department and Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office have responded and are actively investigating the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

Officials have not yet released the victim’s identity or any details regarding potential suspects. The area remains an active crime scene as detectives continue their investigation.

More information will be provided as soon as it becomes publicly available through official sources.


Discover more from HUDTRUTH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Leroy Truth Investigations